Menu


Find the EGU on

Follow us on Twitter Find us on Facebook Find us on Google+ Find us on LinkedIn Find us on YouTube

Tag your tweets with #egu2012
(What is this?)

NH3.10

Documentation and monitoring of landslides and debris flows for mathematical modelling and design of mitigation measures
Convener: L. Franzi  | Co-Conveners: M. Arattano , M. Arai 
Oral Programme
 / Thu, 26 Apr, 15:30–17:00  / Room 8
Poster Programme
 / Attendance Thu, 26 Apr, 17:30–19:00  / Hall X/Y
Add this session to your Personal programme

The ideal sequence that should be pursued in the approach to the difficult problem of the investigation, management and hazard mitigation of mass movements in general is as follows:
1. Systematic collection of field data should be carried out in order to provide a large base of reliable data that could allow a better knowledge of the existing risky situations, a deeper understanding of the mechanics of the processes, of their global behaviour and their effects;
2. Mathematical and physical models, which strongly depend on data and measurements collected and performed in the field for their calibration and design, should be applied. These may need to be developed specially for the task, in which case they will need to be tested and verified;
3. Hazard mapping techniques and identification of possible scenarios, which need reliable models to be effective and sound, should be then set up;
4. The best mitigation solutions should be identified, designed and built;
5. A programme of systematic observations on the sites where risk has been mitigated should be planned and carried out to identify any shortcoming and test the efficiency of the interventions.

Each of the above study and investigation fields needs improvements, but ameliorations are strongly interconnected. As an example, existing monitoring devices need in general to be improved to be able to perform measurements in all the different field conditions in which mass movements may occur along a road/railway system. Improving measurement and documentation procedures should provide knowledge and ideas for new and better models. The application of existing models based on the data collected in the field and the development of sound, reliable new models would allow on one hand to better focus what to observe in the field and, on the other hand, would improve mitigating interventions methodologies, hazard mapping procedures, monitoring systems. The application of mathematical models to study cases would then reveal new parameters that would need to be measured and which improvements should be introduced in the models. From these activities the best mitigating solutions should emerge and will thus be applied.

Scientists working in the fields of monitoring, modelling, hazard mapping and design of mitigation measures against mass movements should therefore keep in close contact and have frequent open meetings to share best practice.

This session will offer to these scientists a chance to present their recent advancements in any of the above themes, to discuss the requirements that will allow the discipline to advance, and set forth future research requirements.