EGU2020-10325, updated on 18 Apr 2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-10325
EGU General Assembly 2020
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Modelling of long-term permafrost evolution in the discontinuous permafrost zone of North-West Siberia

Ekaterina Ezhova1, Ilmo Kukkonen2, Elli Suhonen1, Olga Ponomareva3, Andrey Gravis3, Viktor Gennadinik4, Victoria Miles5, Dmitry Drozdov3,4,6, Hanna Lappalainen1, Vladimir Melnikov3,4,7, and Markku Kulmala1
Ekaterina Ezhova et al.
  • 1INAR/Physics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
  • 2Department of Geosciences and Geography, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
  • 3Institute of the Earth Cryosphere, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
  • 4International Institute of Cryology and Cryosophy, Tyumen State University, Tyumen, Russia
  • 5Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Center, Bergen, Norway
  • 6Department of Engineering Geology, Ordzhonikidze Russian State Geological Prospecting University, Moscow, Russia
  • 7Department of Earth Cryology, Industrial University of Tyumen, Tyumen, Russia

The rate of climate warming in North-West Siberia is among the highest in the world and this trend is especially pronounced in summer [1]. Analysis of permafrost thermal conditions in this area provides plausible scenarios of permafrost degradation also elsewhere. An increase in the summer mean temperature together with the prolongation of the warm season results in the increase of the thawing degree-days enhancing thawing of permafrost. Here we present the results of decadal temperature observations from three boreholes near Nadym, North-West Siberia. We further use the results and the observed cryolithological structure of soils in two boreholes to model the long-term evolution of the deep permafrost under two climate scenarios, RCP2.6 (climate action, fast reduction of CO2 emissions) and RCP8.5 (‘business as usual’). Both borehole sites have a topmost high-porosity, high-ice content layer of peat which helps prolonging the degradation. The main difference between the boreholes is snow cover resulting from the difference of borehole positions (one is located on the top of the hill). Our results suggest that under RCP8.5 scenario permafrost will degrade in both boreholes. On the contrary, under RCP2.6 scenario permafrost will degrade in one borehole with the deeper snow cover, where it already shows the signs of degradation. For the other borehole, the model predicts that permafrost will not degrade within the next 300 years, although the permafrost temperatures are eventually above -1°C.

[1] Frey K.E. & Smith L.C. Recent temperature and precipitation increases in West Siberia and their association with the Arctic Oscillation. Polar Research 22(2), 287–300 (2003).

How to cite: Ezhova, E., Kukkonen, I., Suhonen, E., Ponomareva, O., Gravis, A., Gennadinik, V., Miles, V., Drozdov, D., Lappalainen, H., Melnikov, V., and Kulmala, M.: Modelling of long-term permafrost evolution in the discontinuous permafrost zone of North-West Siberia, EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-10325, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-10325, 2020.

Displays

Display file