EGU2020-11445, updated on 12 Jun 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-11445
EGU General Assembly 2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

A space-based perspective of trends in air quality in major cities in the UK and India

Karn Vohra1, Eloise Marais2, Louisa Kramer1, William Bloss1, Peter Porter3, Martin Van Damme4, Lieven Clarisse4, and Pierre-François Coheur4
Karn Vohra et al.
  • 1School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
  • 2School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
  • 3Birmingham City Council, Birmingham, UK
  • 4Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Spectroscopy, Quantum Chemistry and Atmospheric Remote Sensing (SQUARES), Brussels, Belgium

Air pollution is one of the leading global causes of premature mortality, necessitating routine monitoring of air quality in cities where most (55%) people now reside. Surface monitors are sparse and costly to operate, whereas satellites provide global coverage of a multitude of pollutants spanning more than 2 decades. Here we make use of the dynamic range of satellite products to understand long-term changes in air quality in target cities in the UK (London and Birmingham) and India (Kanpur and Delhi). These include nitrogen dioxide (NO2) from OMI for 2005-2018, formaldehyde (HCHO) from OMI for 2005-2016 to monitor non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOCs), ammonia (NH3) from IASI for 2008-2017 and aerosol optical depth (AOD) from MODIS for 2005-2018 to monitor PM2.5. Where surface observations are available (almost exclusively the UK), we first evaluate the ability of the satellite observations to reproduce variability in surface air pollution. We find temporal consistency for most pollutants (R >= 0.5), with the exception of MODIS AOD and surface PM2.5 (R = 0.3), but the decline in AOD (3.0% a-1) and surface PM2.5 (2.8% a-1), so far only evaluated for London, is similar. Inconsistencies result from seasonal variability in the planetary boundary layer, differences in sampling footprint between the satellite and surface monitors, and interferences in the surface measurements (as is the case for NO2). We find a decrease in all pollutants in Birmingham and London and an increase in all pollutants in Delhi and Kanpur, over the analysis period, but not all trends are significant. Birmingham and London NO2 both declined by 2.5% a-1, whereas Delhi NO2 increased by 2.0% a-1, so that by the end of 2018 Delhi and London have the same tropospheric column concentrations of NO2. Only Delhi exhibits a significant NMVOCs trend (increase) of 1.8% a-1. NH3 trends are not significant in any of the four cities, consistent with bottom-up inventories and lack of direct controls on emissions of this pollutant, mostly from agriculture. These data show no evidence of air quality improvements in Delhi, despite rollout of strict controls on industry and vehicles.

How to cite: Vohra, K., Marais, E., Kramer, L., Bloss, W., Porter, P., Van Damme, M., Clarisse, L., and Coheur, P.-F.: A space-based perspective of trends in air quality in major cities in the UK and India, EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-11445, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-11445, 2020

Displays

Display file