EGU2020-11545
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-11545
EGU General Assembly 2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Secondary Volcanically-Induced Lunar Atmosphere and Lunar Volatiles: 3-D Modeling and Analysis

Igor Aleinov1,2, Michael Way2,7, Kostas Tsigaridis1,2, Eric Wolf3, Chester Harman4, Guillaume Gronoff5, and Christopher Hamilton6
Igor Aleinov et al.
  • 1Center for Climate Systems Research, Columbia University, New York, NY 10025, USA (igor.aleinov@columbia.edu)
  • 2NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, NY, 10025, USA
  • 3University of Colorado, Boulder, USA
  • 4Space Sciences Division, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, USA
  • 5Science Directorate, Chemistry and Dynamics Branch, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA
  • 6SSAI, Hampton, 8VA, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
  • 7Theoretical Astrophysics, Department of Physics & Astronomy, Uppsala University, Uppsala SE-75120, Sweden

The fact that the Moon could have a transient secondary atmosphere due to volcanic outgassing has been known for some time, though typically such an atmosphere was believed to be extremely thin (~10-8 bar) [1]. But recent research by Needham and Kring (NK) [2] suggests that during the peak of volcanic activity ~3.5 Ga such a volcanically-outgassed atmosphere could reach ~10-2 bar of surface pressure. In similar research Wilson et al. [3] proposed a more conservative estimate, arguing that the thickness of such an atmosphere would depend on the intervals between major eruptions and may not exceed microbar densities. In either case a collisional atmosphere could be present, which would control transport of outgassed volatiles (such as H2O) and their deposition in polar regions, where they could be preserved until modern day frozen in permanently shadowed regions (PSR) or buried beneath the regolith.

Here we study such a hypothetical atmosphere to investigate its stability, meteorological properties and the effect on transport of volatiles. We use the ROCKE-3D planetary 3-D General Circulation Model (GCM)[4]. The insolation and orbital parameters were set to conditions 3.5 Ga. The atmospheric composition, based on the list of outgassed species presented by NK in combination with our estimates for atmospheric escape, condensation and the results from our 1-D chemistry model, was chosen to be either CO-dominated or CO2-dominated (depending on atmospheric temperature). In this study we restricted ourselves to relatively "thick" lunar atmospheres of 1-10 mb, though we believe that our results will scale to thinner atmospheres as well.

We present the results for ground and atmospheric temperature for modeled atmospheres over a wide parameter space. In particular we consider  different atmospheric compositions (CO or CO2 dominated), a set of atmospheric pressures from 1 mb to 10 mb and a set of obliquities from 0o to 40o. We also present an experiment of a single major eruption [5] and show that in just 3 years ~80% of the outgassed water is deposited in polar regions. This demonstrates the efficiency of such an atmosphere in delivering volatiles. We argue that a secondary lunar atmosphere could play a significant role in forming volatile deposits currently observed in the polar regions of the Moon. 

References:
[1] Stern S. A. (1999) Rev. of Geophysics, 37, 453-492.
[2] Needham D. H. and Kring D. A. (2017) Earth and Planetary Sci. Lett., 478, 175-178.
[3] Wilson L. et al. (2019) LPSC 50, Abstract 1343. 
[4] Way M. J. et al. (2017) ApJS, 231, 12.
[5] Wilson L. and Head J. W. (2018) GRL, 45, 5852-5859.

 

How to cite: Aleinov, I., Way, M., Tsigaridis, K., Wolf, E., Harman, C., Gronoff, G., and Hamilton, C.: Secondary Volcanically-Induced Lunar Atmosphere and Lunar Volatiles: 3-D Modeling and Analysis, EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-11545, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-11545, 2020

Displays

Display file