EGU2020-12014, updated on 08 May 2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-12014
EGU General Assembly 2020
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Multifactor colorimetric analysis on pH-indicator papers: an optimized approach for direct determination of ambient aerosol pH

Guo Li1, Hang Su1, Nan Ma2, Guangjie Zheng1, Uwe Kuhn1, Meng Li1, Thomas Klimach1, Ulrich Pöschl1, and Yafang Cheng1
Guo Li et al.
  • 1Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Multiphase Chemistry Department, Mainz, Germany
  • 2Institute for Environmental and Climate Research, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China

Direct measurement of the acidity (pH) of ambient aerosol particles/droplets has long been a challenge for atmospheric scientists.  A novel and facile method was introduced recently by Craig et al. (2018), where the pH of size-resolved aerosol droplets was directly measured by two types of pH-indicator papers (pH ranges: 0 – 2.5 and 2.5 – 4.5) combined with RGB-based colorimetric analyses using a model of G-B (G minus B) versus pH2.  Given the wide pH range of ambient aerosols, we optimize the RGB-based colorimetric analysis on pH papers with a wider detection range (pH ~ 0 to 6).  Here, we propose a new model to establish the linear relationship between RGB values and pH: pHpredict = a×Rnormal + b×Gnormal + c×Bnormal.  This model shows a wider applicability and higher accuracy than those in previous studies, and is thus recommended in future RGB-based colorimetric analyses on pH papers.  Moreover, we identify one type of pH paper (Hydrion® Brilliant pH dip stiks, Lot Nr. 3110, Sigma-Aldrich) that is more applicable for ambient aerosols in terms of its wide pH detection range (0 to 6) and strong anti-interference capacity.  The determined minimum sample mass (~ 180 µg) highlights its potential to predict aerosol pH with a high time resolution (e.g., ≤ 1 hour).  We further show that the routinely adopted way of using pH color charts to predict aerosol pH may be biased by the mismatch between the standard colors on the color charts and the real colors of investigated samples.  Thus, instead of using the producer-provided color chart, we suggest an in-situ calibration of pH papers with standard pH buffers.

Reference:

Craig, et al., Direct determination of aerosol pH: Size-resolved measurements of submicrometer and supermicrometer aqueous particles. Analytical Chemistry, 90 (19), 11232-11239, 2018.

Cheng, et al., Reactive nitrogen chemistry in aerosol water as a source of sulfate during haze events in China. Science Advances, 2 (12), e1601530, 10.1126/sciadv.1601530, 2016.

Zheng, et al., Exploring the severe winter haze in Beijing: The impact of synoptic weather, regional transport and heterogeneous reactions. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 15, 2969-2983, 2015.

Li, et al., Multifactor colorimetric analysis on pH-indicator papers: an optimized approach for direct determination of ambient aerosol pH, Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2019-394, in review, 2019.

How to cite: Li, G., Su, H., Ma, N., Zheng, G., Kuhn, U., Li, M., Klimach, T., Pöschl, U., and Cheng, Y.: Multifactor colorimetric analysis on pH-indicator papers: an optimized approach for direct determination of ambient aerosol pH, EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-12014, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-12014, 2020.

Displays

Display file