EGU2020-13689
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-13689
EGU General Assembly 2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Insights into measuring highly variable and sporadic N2O emissions in a fertile peatland forest with automatic chambers

Annalea Lohila1,2, Mika Korkiakoski1, Paavo Ojanen3, Kari Minkkinen3, Timo Penttilä4, Juuso Rainne1, and Tuomas Laurila1
Annalea Lohila et al.
  • 1Finnish Meteorological Institute, Climate System Research, Helsinki, Finland (annalea.lohila@fmi.fi)
  • 2INAR Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research/Physics, University of Helsinki, Finland
  • 3University of Helsinki, Department of Forest Sciences, Finland
  • 4Natural Resources Institute Finland, Helsinki, Finland

Drainage and other management activities in peatlands make especially the fertile sites a source of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. In addition to typically losing carbon dioxide (CO2) from the old peat, they act as sources of nitrous oxide (N2O) into the atmosphere. In contrary to CO2, N2O fluxes do not necessarily show a distinct seasonal cycle with high emissions in summer and low in winter. Instead, the most intense peaks in N2O fluxes have been earlier attributed to freezing-thawing cycles of peat soil. Emissions of N2O have been reported to vary greatly both in time and space. Due to instrument limitations, the fluxes have been typically measured using manual chamber technique which provides only a snapshot of the potentially highly dynamic fluxes.

In this presentation we show multi-year results of N2O fluxes captured by automatic chambers and compare those to temporally sparse manual chamber measurements. Our study site was a nutrient-rich drained peatland ‘Lettosuo’ located in Tammela in southern Finland. The peatland, originally an herb-rich tall sedge pine fen was drained for forestry in 1969. After that, the tree stand was a mixture of Scots pine, Norway spruce and Downy birch. N2O fluxes were measured hourly with six automatic chambers. We will address the temporal and spatial variability in the fluxes and the plausible reasons behind them, including the drought of summer 2018, and give a summary of the exploitability of different methods. Suggestions for an improved chamber configuration and for the optimal sampling frequency for manual chambers will be given based on the results.

 

 

 

How to cite: Lohila, A., Korkiakoski, M., Ojanen, P., Minkkinen, K., Penttilä, T., Rainne, J., and Laurila, T.: Insights into measuring highly variable and sporadic N2O emissions in a fertile peatland forest with automatic chambers, EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-13689, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-13689, 2020