EGU2020-16565
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-16565
EGU General Assembly 2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Different pockmark systems and their potential importance for the hydrological and biogeochemical balance of a peri-alpine lake

Adeline N.Y. Cojean1, Maciej Bartosiewicz2, Jeremy Zimmermann1, Moritz F. Lehmann2, Katrina Kremer3, and Stefanie B. Wirth1
Adeline N.Y. Cojean et al.
  • 1Centre for Hydrogeology and Geothermics, University of Neuchatel, Rue Emile-Argand 11, CH-2000 Neuchâtel (adeline.cojean@unine.ch)
  • 2Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 30, CH-4056 Basel
  • 3Swiss Seismological Service (SED), ETH Zürich, Sonneggstrasse 5, CH-8006 Zürich

Pockmarks are crater-like depressions on the floor of oceans and lakes formed by the upward transport of fluids through the unconsolidated sediment column. The fluid flow through marine pockmarks is considered to enhance hydrological and biogeochemical exchanges between the sediments and the water body. While a similar relevance can be expected in lakes, the importance of lacustrine pockmarks in this regard is virtually unexplored.

Lake Thun (48.3 km2 surface area), Switzerland, is an excellent system to study lacustrine pockmarks as it exhibits several sites with different geological and biogeochemical settings. One of the pockmark sites is characterized by evident methane (CH4) ebullition and high CH4 concentrations from ~2.4 to 8.9 mM within the sediments beneath. A large pockmark with a diameter of 110 m is located adjacent to the rock wall of a karst system and might thus be associated with groundwater discharge into the lake. Finally, spikes in electrical conductivity detected during a survey with a remotely operated vehicle (ROV) at a third pockmark site suggest a hydrogeological connection with the groundwater system in the underlying Triassic bedrock.

This third pockmark site we are studying more closely. We observed that the sediments inside the pockmark were clearly more liquified as compared to those at a reference site (outside the pockmark), providing further evidence for groundwater discharge that might presently be active. The porewater chemistry was similar at the two sites, except for the total dissolved Fe concentration which was about 2 to 5-fold lower inside the pockmark than at a reference site. Further chemical analysis of porewaters and the water column above the pockmark as well as a molecular investigation (e.g. 16S rRNA) of the sediments will be performed at two different seasons of the year (in fall and spring during the snowmelt season). All together, these results should help us to better assess the influence of groundwater discharge via this pockmark site on the hydrological balance and on the biogeochemistry of the lake, as well as to expand our limited knowledge on the mechanism of lacustrine pockmarks in general.

How to cite: Cojean, A. N. Y., Bartosiewicz, M., Zimmermann, J., Lehmann, M. F., Kremer, K., and Wirth, S. B.: Different pockmark systems and their potential importance for the hydrological and biogeochemical balance of a peri-alpine lake, EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-16565, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-16565, 2020

Displays

Display file