EGU2020-1715
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-1715
EGU General Assembly 2020
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Observation and thermodynamic modeling of the influence of snow cover on landfast sea ice thickness in Prydz Bay, East Antarctica

Jiechen Zhao1,2,3, Bin Cheng3, Timo Vihma3, Qinghua Yang4,5, Fengming Hui6, Biao Zhao7, Guanghua Hao1, Hui Shen1, and Lin Zhang1
Jiechen Zhao et al.
  • 1National Marine Environmental Forecasting Center, Polar Departmeant, China (zhaojc@nmefc.cn)
  • 2Laboratory for Regional Oceanography and Numerical Modelling, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao 266237, China
  • 3Finnish Meteorological Institute (FMI), Helsinki 00101, Finland
  • 4School of Atmospheric Sciences, and Guangdong Province Key Laboratory for Climate Change and Natural Disaster Studies, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519082, China
  • 5Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai 519082, China
  • 6School of Geospatial Engineering and Science, Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai 519082, China
  • 7First Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Qingdao 266061, China

The observed snow depth and ice thickness on landfast sea ice in Prydz Bay, East Antarctica, were used to determine the role of snow in (a) the annual cycle of sea ice thickness at a fixed location (SIP) where snow usually blows away after snowfall and (b) early summer sea ice thickness within the transportation route surveys (TRS) domain farther from coast, where annual snow accumulation is substantial. The annual mean snow depth and maximum ice thickness had a negative relationship (r = −0.58, p < 0.05) at SIP, indicating a primary insulation effect of snow on ice thickness. However, in the TRS domain, this effect was negligible because snow contributes to ice thickness. A one-dimensional thermodynamic sea ice model, forced by local weather observations, reproduced the annual cycle of ice thickness at SIP well. During the freeze season, the modeled maximum difference of ice thickness using different snowfall scenarios ranged from 0.53–0.61 m. Snow cover delayed ice surface and ice bottom melting by 45 and 24 days, respectively. The modeled snow ice and superimposed ice accounted for 4–23% and 5–8% of the total maximum ice thickness on an annual basis in the case of initial ice thickness ranging from 0.05–2 m, respectively.

How to cite: Zhao, J., Cheng, B., Vihma, T., Yang, Q., Hui, F., Zhao, B., Hao, G., Shen, H., and Zhang, L.: Observation and thermodynamic modeling of the influence of snow cover on landfast sea ice thickness in Prydz Bay, East Antarctica, EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-1715, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-1715, 2020.