EGU2020-19830, updated on 10 Jan 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-19830
EGU General Assembly 2020
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Standardizing high precision Δʹ17O data from silicate rocks and minerals

Martin Miller1, Andreas Pack2, Ilya Bindeman3, and Richard Greenwood1
Martin Miller et al.
  • 1Planetary and Space Sciences, Department of Physical Sciences, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK
  • 2Universität Göttingen, Geowissenschaftliches Zentrum, Goldschmidtstraße 1, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
  • 3Department of Earth Sciences, University of Oregon, 1275 E 13th St., Eugene, OR, 97403-1272, USA

The Δʹ17O value of O2 gas (the analyte for nearly all oxygen triple isotope measurements) can currently be measured to a precision of about 6 ppm; significantly better than the precision of the corresponding δ17O and δ18O data. However, reporting Δʹ17O measurements of silicate rocks to this degree of accuracy, relative to (for example) the VSMOW-SLAP line on the ln(1 + δ17O) versus ln(1 + δ18O) plot, poses practical challenges. Regardless of the reference line assigned, Δʹ17O values are still inextricably linked to the δ17O and δ18O calibration of the ‘working standard’ O2 on the VSMOW–SLAP scale. Yet few laboratories have the capability to make such measurements on waters and on silicates. Even when direct calibration to VSMOW and SLAP is possible, there is not yet consensus on the Δʹ17O values of widely used silicate standards such as UWG-2 garnet or San Carlos olivine, when reported to a common reference line.

Fluorination of silicate rocks and minerals, to produce O2 for isotope ratio measurements, requires a different procedure from that used for the fluorination of waters. Thus, there is the possibility of systematic errors being introduced by using a water reference material for reporting δ17O and δ18O data of silicates. Furthermore, fractionation arrays of natural silicates on the three-isotope plot are generally offset from VSMOW, which introduces an additional complication. To eliminate such potential sources of error, some authors have chosen to report δ17O and δ18O data relative to San Carlos olivine (as representative of Earth’s mantle) rather than to VSMOW, in conjunction with a reference line of assigned slope, for characterizing Δʹ17O values. However, a two-point scale, such as VSMOW–SLAP for waters, is preferable to a single point calibration

We have therefore characterized Δʹ17O values (and with inter-laboratory comparison) of two silicates spanning a greater δ18O range than VSMOW–SLAP and suggest that these materials may be used for accurate determinations of silicate Δʹ17O values. Our high-δ18O standard is a flint, designated SKFS, with δ18O = 33.93 ± 0.08 ‰ (standard error) and Δʹ17O = –69 ± 3 ppm relative to the VSMOW-SLAP reference line. This material can therefore be used to calibrate the position of an assigned reference line such that it passes through VSMOW. Alternatively, in combination with our low-δ18O silicate standard, designated as KRS (δ18O = –25.20 ± 0.03, Δʹ17O = –114 ± 2 ppm relative to the VSMOW-SLAP reference line), an empirical two-point silicate reference line may be defined from high precision δ17O and δ18O measurements of these proposed standards. Δʹ17O data of silicate rock and mineral samples reported relative to this reference line are independent of whether the δ17O and δ18O measurements are reported relative to VSMOW or to the ‘working standard’ O2, of any isotopic composition. This confers significant advantages for inter-laboratory comparisons.

How to cite: Miller, M., Pack, A., Bindeman, I., and Greenwood, R.: Standardizing high precision Δʹ17O data from silicate rocks and minerals, EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-19830, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-19830, 2020.

Displays

Display file