EGU2020-3655
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-3655
EGU General Assembly 2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

The Barreme Basin and the Gevaudan diapir - an example of the interplay between compressional tectonics and salt diapirism

Rod Graham and Adam Csicsek
Rod Graham and Adam Csicsek
  • Imperial College, Earth Science & Engineering

The Barreme Basin and the Gevaudan diapir - an example of the interplay between compressional tectonics and salt diapirism

 

Adam Csicsek and Rod Graham

Imperial College London

 

Our understanding of the role of salt diapirism in determining the finite geometry of fold and thrust belts has grown apace in the last few years, but the interplay between the two remains a significant problem for structural interpretation. The Gevaudan diapir in the fold and thrust belt of the sub-Alpine chain of Haute Provence is well known and has been documented by numerous eminent alpine structural geologists. Graciansky, Dardot, Mascle, Gidon and Lickorish and Ford have all described and illustrated the geometry and evolution of the structure, and Lickorish and Ford’s interpretation is figured as an example of  diapirism  in a compressional setting by Jackson and Hudec in their text on salt tectonics. We review these various interpretations and present another.

The differences between the various interpretations say much about the complex interplay of salt diapirism and thin-skinned thrusting and have profound implications for the way we interpret the tectonic and sedimentary evolution of the Barreme basin which lies adjacent to the diapir

The Barreme basin is a thrust-top fragment of the Provencal foreland basin and has been described in detail from both sedimentological (e.g. Evans and Elliott, 1999) and structural (e.g. Antoni and Meckel, 1997) points of view. Here we make the case that it is also a salt related minibasin - a secondary minibasin developed on a now welded allochthonous Middle Cretaceous salt canopy.  We believe that within the basin it is possible to interpret successive depocentres which may record progressive salt withdrawal. We argue that though thrust loading must be the fundamental driving mechanism responsible for salt movement late in the tectonic history of the region, thrusting has not done much more than modify existing salt related geometry.    

How to cite: Graham, R. and Csicsek, A.: The Barreme Basin and the Gevaudan diapir - an example of the interplay between compressional tectonics and salt diapirism, EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-3655, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-3655, 2020

Displays

Display file