EGU2020-5396, updated on 09 Jan 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-5396
EGU General Assembly 2020
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Validation of satellite-constrained ammonia using a CTM and ground and satellite measurements

Nikolaos Evangeliou1, Yves Balkanski2, Sabine Eckhardt1, Didier Hauglustaine2, Anne Cozic2, and Andreas Stohl1,3
Nikolaos Evangeliou et al.
  • 1NILU - Norwegian Institute for Air Research, Kjeller, Norway (sec@nilu.no)
  • 2LSCE, CEA CNRS UVSQ, 91191, Gif sur Yvette, France, Gif-Sur-Yvette Cedex, France
  • 3Institute of Meteorology and Geophysics, University of Vienna, Austria

Ammonia (NH3) has received a lot of attention nowadays due to its major implications for the population and the environment. Global sources of ammonia include wild animals, ammonia-containing water areas, traffic, sewage systems, humans, biomass burning (mainly from dung fires and domestic coal combustion), volcanic eruptions and agriculture. In the present study, we used 10 years (2008–2017) of satellite measurements of ammonia retrieved from the Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI) to calculate surface emissions. In contrast to other methods, we first used a sophisticated Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW) interpolation algorithm to define a grid of column-integrated ammonia concentrations globally. In a hypothetical box model, emissions are given as a function of the mass of ammonia in each atmospheric box (in molecules cm-3) divided by the lifetime of ammonia in the box (in seconds) based on all the potential removal processes that affect atmospheric ammonia. Instead of considering the lifetime of ammonia as a constant value, such as in the relevant literature, we used calculated gridded lifetimes from a Chemistry Transport Model (CTM). The estimated emissions were then imported in a CTM and were simulated for the same 10–year period. To verify the improvement of the calculated emissions of ammonia, we evaluated the modelled surface concentrations against ground–based measurements from different monitoring stations. The same comparison was performed for the most recent state–of–the–art emission dataset for ammonia.

How to cite: Evangeliou, N., Balkanski, Y., Eckhardt, S., Hauglustaine, D., Cozic, A., and Stohl, A.: Validation of satellite-constrained ammonia using a CTM and ground and satellite measurements, EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-5396, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-5396, 2020.

Displays

Display file