EGU2020-6691
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-6691
EGU General Assembly 2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

In-situ petrophysical and geomechanical characterization and 3D modelling of a mature normal fault zone (Goddo fault, Bømlo – Norway)

Alberto Ceccato1, Giulio Viola1, Marco Antonellini1, Giulia Tartaglia1, and Eric James Ryan2
Alberto Ceccato et al.
  • 1University of Bologna - Alma Mater Studiorum, Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, Bologna, Italy (alberto.ceccato@unibo.it)
  • 2Norwegian University of Science and Technology NTNU – Department of Geoscience and Petroleum, Trondheim, Norway

The detailed characterization of internal fault zone architecture and  petrophysical and geomechanical properties of fault rocks is fundamental to understanding the flow and mechanical behaviour of mature fault zones. The Goddo normal fault (Bømlo – Norway) accommodated c. E-W extension related to North Sea Rifting from Permian to Early Cretaceous times [1]. It represents a good example of a mature, iteratively reactivated and thus long-lived (seismogenic?) fault zone, developed in a pervasively fractured granitoid basement at upper crustal conditions in a regional extensional setting.

Field characterization of the fault zone’s structural facies and analysis of background fracture patterns in the protolith have been integrated with in-situ petrophysical and geomechanical surveys of the recognized fault zone architectural components. In-situ air-permeability and mechanical directional tests (performed with NER TinyPerm III air-minipermeameter and DRC GeoHammer, L-type Schmidt hammer, respectively) have allowed for the quantification of the permeability tensor and mechanical properties (UCS and elastic modulus) within each brittle structural facies. Mechanical properties measured parallel to fault rock fabric of cataclasite- and gouge-bearing structural facies differ by up to one order of magnitude from those measured perpendicularly to it (~10 MPa vs. 100-200 MPa in UCS, respectively). Accordingly, permeability of cataclasite- and gouge-bearing facies is several orders of magnitude larger when measured parallel to fault-rock fabric than that perpendicular to it (10-0-10-1 D vs. 10-2-10-3 D, respectively). Virtual outcrop models (VOMs) of the fault zone were obtained from high-resolution UAV-photogrammetry. Field measurements of fracture orientations were used for calibration of the VOMs to construct a statistically robust fracture dataset. The results of VOMs structural analysis allowed for the quantification of fracture intensity and geometrical characteristics of mesoscopic fracture patterns within the different domains of the fault zone architecture.

Results from field, VOMs structural analysis, and in-situ petrophysical investigations have been integrated into a realistic 3D fault zone model with the software 3DMove (Petex). This model can be used to investigate the influence of mesoscopic fracture patterns, related to either the fault zone or the background fracturing, on the hydro-mechanical behaviour of a mature fault zone. In addition, the evolution of the hydro-mechanical properties through time can be assessed by integrating the progressive development of brittle structural facies and fracture sets developed during the incremental strain and stress history into the model. This contribution proposes a geologically-constrained method to quantify the geometry of 3D fault zones, as a possible tool for models to be adopted in stress-strain analysis, hydraulic characterization and in the mechanical analysis of fault zones.

[1] Viola, G., Scheiber, T., Fredin, O., Zwingmann, H., Margreth, A., & Knies, J. (2016). Deconvoluting complex structural histories archived in brittle fault zones. Nature communications, 7, 13448.

How to cite: Ceccato, A., Viola, G., Antonellini, M., Tartaglia, G., and Ryan, E. J.: In-situ petrophysical and geomechanical characterization and 3D modelling of a mature normal fault zone (Goddo fault, Bømlo – Norway), EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-6691, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-6691, 2020