EGU2020-8428
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-8428
EGU General Assembly 2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Numerical Insights into the Formation and Stability of Cratons

Charitra Jain1, Antoine Rozel2, Emily Chin3, and Jeroen van Hunen1
Charitra Jain et al.
  • 1Department of Earth Sciences, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
  • 2Institute of Geophysics, Department of Earth Sciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  • 3Scripps Institution of Oceanography, UC San Diego, La Jolla, United States
Geophysical, geochemical, and geological investigations have attributed the stable behaviour of Earth's continents to the presence of strong and viscous cratons underlying the continental crust. The cratons are underlain by thick and cold mantle keels, which are composed of melt-depleted and low density peridotite residues [1]. Progressive melt extraction increases the magnesium number Mg# in the residual peridotite, thereby making the roots of cratons chemically buoyant [2, 3] and counteracting their negative thermal buoyancy. Recent global models have shown the self-consistent production of Archean continental crust by two-step mantle differentiation [4]. These models exhibit intense recycling of crust with delamination and eclogitic dripping in the first 500 million years and this behaviour is similar to the "plutonic-squishy lid'' that has been suggested for the early Earth. However, no stable continents form and no major regime transition from "vertical tectonics'' towards "horizontal tectonics'' is observed. This points to the missing ingredient of cratonic lithosphere in these models, which could act as a stable basement for the crustal material to accumulate on and may help initiate plate tectonics. Based on the bulk FeO and MgO content of the residual peridotites, it has been proposed that cratonic mantle formed by hot shallow melting with mantle potential temperature, which was higher by 200-300 °C than present-day [5]. We will introduce Fe-Mg partitioning between mantle peridotite and melt to track the Mg# variation through melting, and parametrise craton formation using the corresponding P-T formation conditions. Grain-size evolution, which has been shown to influence mantle rheology [6] is another mechanism that may contribute towards cratonic strength and will be explored using self-consistent global geodynamic models.
 
[1] Boyd, F. R. High-and low-temperature garnet peridotite xenoliths and their possible relation to the lithosphere- asthenosphere boundary beneath Africa. In Nixon, P. H. (ed.) Mantle Xenolith, 403–412 (John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 1987).
[2] Jordan, T. H. Mineralogies, densities and seismic velocities of garnet lherzolites and their geophysical implications. In The Mantle Sample: Inclusion in Kimberlites and Other Volcanics, 1–14 (American Geophysical Union, Washington, D. C., 1979).
[3] Schutt, D. L. & Lesher, C. E. Effects of melt depletion on the density and seismic velocity of garnet and spinel lherzolite. Journal of Geophysical Research 111 (2006).
[4] Jain, C., Rozel, A. B., Tackley, P. J., Sanan, P. & Gerya, T. V. Growing primordial continental crust self-consistently in global mantle convection models. Gondwana Research 73, 96–122 (2019).
[5] Lee, C.-T. A. & Chin, E. J. Calculating melting temperatures and pressures of peridotite protoliths: Implications for the origin of cratonic mantle. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 403, 273–286 (2014).
[6] Hall, C. E. & Parmentier, E. M. Influence of grain size evolution on convective instability. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 4, 469 (2003).

How to cite: Jain, C., Rozel, A., Chin, E., and van Hunen, J.: Numerical Insights into the Formation and Stability of Cratons, EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-8428, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-8428, 2020

Displays

Display file