EGU2020-8861
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-8861
EGU General Assembly 2020
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

TROPOMI SO2 column retrievals: validation, inter-comparison with other satellite data sets and algorithm evolution

Nicolas Theys1, Can Li2, Nickolay Krotkov2, Isabelle De Smedt1, Christophe Lerot1, Huan Yu1, Jonas Vlietinck1, Vitali Fioletov3, Pascal Hedelt4, Diego Loyola4, Thomas Wagner5, and Michel Van Roozendael1
Nicolas Theys et al.
  • 1BIRA-IASB, Bruxelles, Belgium (theys@aeronomie.be)
  • 2Atmospheric Chemistry and Dynamics Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight 10 Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
  • 3Air Quality Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Canada.
  • 4Institut für Methodik der Fernerkundung (IMF), Deutsches Zentrum für Luft und Raumfahrt (DLR), Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany.
  • 5Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany.

Since nearly two years, the operational SO2 product from the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) onboard Sentinel-5 Precursor (S5P) platform has provided important information on volcanic and anthropogenic SO2 emissions, with an unprecedented level of details. In this presentation, we critically discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the current operational algorithm in light of the validation results obtained so far, and present how the retrieval scheme could evolve in the future.

In the first part, we briefly present the main algorithm features and an overview of the SO2 product validation. One challenge in this respect is the current lack of ground-based SO2 measurements for anthropogenic source regions. We therefore rely largely on comparisons with other satellite datasets (e.g., OMI and OMPS). The main lesson learnt is that satellite SO2 retrievals generally agree very well for large SO2 columns (mostly volcanic) while persisting differences exist for low columns when different algorithms are compared. This motivates the second part of the presentation which aims at extensively comparing the results from existing S5P SO2 operational and scientific algorithms, notably DOAS and PCA retrievals (or other alternative approaches). Here, all configuration settings and auxiliary data (e.g. absorption cross-sections) are aligned in order to better understand the differences through sensitivity tests. This effort is not only important to improve the TROPOMI SO2 results but it is also particularly relevant in the context of the forthcoming Sentinel-4 mission that will mainly probe weak anthropogenic SO2 sources. The last part of the presentation gives a general overview of new features planned for the next versions of the operational SO2 algorithm.

How to cite: Theys, N., Li, C., Krotkov, N., De Smedt, I., Lerot, C., Yu, H., Vlietinck, J., Fioletov, V., Hedelt, P., Loyola, D., Wagner, T., and Van Roozendael, M.: TROPOMI SO2 column retrievals: validation, inter-comparison with other satellite data sets and algorithm evolution, EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-8861, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-8861, 2020.