EGU21-2535, updated on 03 Mar 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-2535
EGU General Assembly 2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Deriving CME volume and density from remote sensing data

Manuela Temmer1, Lukas Holzknecht1, Mateja Dumbovic2, Bojan Vrsnak2, Nishtha Sachdeva3, Stephan G. Heinemann4, Karin Dissauer1,5, Camilla Scolini6,7, Eleanna Asvestari8, Astrid M. Veronig1,9, and Stefan Hofmeister10
Manuela Temmer et al.
  • 1University of Graz, Institute of Physics, Astrophysics, Graz, Austria (manuela.temmer@uni-graz.at)
  • 2Hvar Observatory, Faculty of Geodesy, University of Zagreb, Croatia
  • 3Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering Department, University of Michigan, USA
  • 4Max-Planck-Institut für Sonnensystemforschung, Justus-von-Liebig-Weg 3, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
  • 5NorthWest Research Associates, Boulder, USA
  • 6University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA
  • 7University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA
  • 8Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Finland
  • 9Kanzelhöhe Observatory for Solar and Environmental Research, University of Graz, Austria
  • 10Columbia Astrophysics Laboratory, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA

Using combined STEREO-SOHO white-light data, we present a method to determine the volume and density of a coronal mass ejection (CME) by applying the graduated cylindrical shell model (GCS) and deprojected mass derivation. Under the assumption that the CME  mass is roughly equally distributed within a specific volume, we expand the CME self-similarly and calculate the CME density for distances close to the Sun (15–30 Rs) and at 1 AU. The procedure is applied on a sample of 29 well-observed CMEs and compared to their interplanetary counterparts (ICMEs). Specific trends are derived comparing calculated and in-situ measured proton densities at 1 AU, though large uncertainties are revealed due to the unknown mass and geometry evolution: i) a moderate correlation for the magnetic structure having a mass that stays rather constant and ii) a weak correlation for the sheath density by assuming the sheath region is an extra mass - as expected for a mass pile-up process - that is in its amount comparable to the initial CME deprojected mass. High correlations are derived between in-situ measured sheath density and the solar wind density and solar wind speed as measured 24 hours ahead of the arrival of the disturbance. This gives additional confirmation that the sheath-plasma indeed stems from piled-up solar wind material. While the CME interplanetary propagation speed is not related to the sheath density, the size of the CME may play some role in how much material is piled up.

How to cite: Temmer, M., Holzknecht, L., Dumbovic, M., Vrsnak, B., Sachdeva, N., Heinemann, S. G., Dissauer, K., Scolini, C., Asvestari, E., Veronig, A. M., and Hofmeister, S.: Deriving CME volume and density from remote sensing data, EGU General Assembly 2021, online, 19–30 Apr 2021, EGU21-2535, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-2535, 2021.

Displays

Display link