EGU21-7661
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-7661
EGU General Assembly 2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Predicting arrival time for CMEs: Machine learning and ensemble methods

Ajay Tiwari1, Enrico Camporeale2, Jannis Teunissen1, Raffaello Foldes3, Gianluca Napoletano3, and Dario Del Moro4
Ajay Tiwari et al.
  • 1Centrum WIskunde and Informatica, Amsterdam, Netherlands (ajaynld13@gmail.com)
  • 2NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center,
  • 3Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche e Chimiche, Università degli studi dell'Aquila
  • 4Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli studi di Roma “Tor Vergata”

Coronal mass ejections (CMEs) are arguably one of the most violent explosions in our solar system. CMEs are also one of the most important drivers for space weather. CMEs can have direct adverse effects on several human activities. Reliable and fast prediction of the CMEs arrival time is crucial to minimize such damage from a CME. We present a new pipeline combining machine learning (ML) with a physical drag-based model of CME propagation to predict the arrival time of the CME. We evaluate both standard ML approaches and a combination of ML + probabilistic drag based model (PDBM, Napoletano et al. 2018). More than 200 previously observed geo-effective partial-/full-halo CMEs make up the database for this study (with information extracted from the Richardson & Cane 2010 catalogue, the CDAW data centre CME list, the LASCO coronagraphic images, and the HEK database - Hurlburt et al. 2010). The P-DBM provides us with a reduced computation time, which is promising for space weather forecasts. We analyzed and compared various machine learning algorithms to identify the best performing algorithm for this database of the CMEs. We also examine the relative importance of various features such as mass, CME propagation speed, and height above the solar limb of the observed CMEs in the prediction of the arrival time. The model is able to accurately predict the arrival times of the CMEs with a mean square error of about 9 hours.  We also explore the differences in prediction from ML models and emblem prediction method namely P-DBM model.

How to cite: Tiwari, A., Camporeale, E., Teunissen, J., Foldes, R., Napoletano, G., and Del Moro, D.: Predicting arrival time for CMEs: Machine learning and ensemble methods, EGU General Assembly 2021, online, 19–30 Apr 2021, EGU21-7661, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-7661, 2021.