EGU21-8676
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-8676
EGU General Assembly 2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Maritime built heritage and marine wildlife: Remote sensing as a tool to identify and prioritise integrated conservation in coastal environments

Tim Baxter, Martin Coombes, and Heather Viles
Tim Baxter et al.
  • Oxford, School of Geography and the Environment, United Kingdom of Great Britain (timothy.baxter@ouce.ox.ac.uk)

Maritime built heritage is threatened by natural hazards and human activities around the world. Likewise, marine wildlife is increasingly threatened by the effects of climate change and human development. Due to their age and traditional construction, maritime built heritage (e.g. historic harbours) may provide unique habitats for diverse assemblages of marine wildlife. Yet, as aspects of built heritage are often missing in assessments of marine infrastructure, identifying which heritage assets have the potential to provide the greatest ecological benefits remains a challenge. An improved understanding of the ecological importance of maritime built heritage can enhance arguments for its continued protection, maintenance and repair. At the same time, this may present new opportunities to conserve important and largely unidentified hotspots of marine biodiversity.

Using preliminary results from the Isles of Scilly, UK, this study presents a novel method for quantifying the full extent of marine engineering structures (including heritage assets) at a regional scale, and for identifying priority structures for joint biodiversity and heritage conservation.

Remote sensing data were considered alongside historic environment data and records of modern coastal defences in a rapid desk-based assessment to create a complete inventory of marine structures along the entire coastline of the Isles of Scilly. In total, 68 structures were recorded (6,180 m in length), with over half registered as heritage assets. LiDAR and aerial photography were used to determine the site characteristics of each structure (e.g. shore position). This allowed for an initial assessment of the potential ecological importance of these structures when considered alongside structural information, including building age and material. By evaluating the ecological potential and heritage value of each structure using a novel scoring system, priorities for conservation and other managed interventions are identified. This includes listed buildings and scheduled monuments that due to their construction features and shore position are most likely to support diverse marine assemblages.

Combined ecological-heritage evaluations incorporating remote sensing datasets allow for the identification of those structures with the greatest potential for the integrated conservation of built heritage and marine wildlife. Research is now needed to develop this method further, ground-truth its outputs, and test its application in other geographical locations and at varying scales.

How to cite: Baxter, T., Coombes, M., and Viles, H.: Maritime built heritage and marine wildlife: Remote sensing as a tool to identify and prioritise integrated conservation in coastal environments, EGU General Assembly 2021, online, 19–30 Apr 2021, EGU21-8676, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-8676, 2021.

Corresponding displays formerly uploaded have been withdrawn.