EGU22-12201, updated on 10 Jan 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-12201
EGU General Assembly 2022
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

From up above to down below: Comparison of satellite- and ground-based observations of SO2 emissions from the 2021 eruption of Cumbre Vieja, La Palma

Catherine Hayer1, José Barrancos2,3, Mike Burton1, Fátima Rodríguez2, Ben Esse1, Pedro Hernández2,3, Gladys Melián2,3, Eleazar Padrón2,3, María Asensio-Ramos2, and Nemesio Pérez2,3
Catherine Hayer et al.
  • 1Dept. of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (catherine.hayer@manchester.ac.uk)
  • 2Instituto Volcanológico de Canarias (INVOLCAN), 38320 San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Tenerife, Canary Islands
  • 3Instituto Tecnológico y de Energías Renovables (ITER), 38600 Granadilla de Abona, Tenerife, Canary Islands

Volcanic gas emissions are an integral part of volcano monitoring around the world and can be interpreted to understand the state of a volcano and the evolution of an individual eruption. The low ambient concentrations of SO2 make it an ideal monitoring candidate.

Throughout the 2021 eruption of Cumbre Vieja, La Palma (Spain), observations of SO2 emissions were made using ground-based instruments, in transverse mode, static scanners and on-board drones, as well as by numerous satellite instruments. Direct comparison between satellite- and ground-based instruments is always challenging, but the long duration of the eruption and repeated measurements from both data sets made this a good candidate.

Data from the Sentinel-5P instrument TROPOMI was combined with the PlumeTraj back-trajectory analysis toolkit to produce sub-daily SO2 fluxes that can be directly compared to the ground-based observations as well as other geophysical and geochemical monitoring data.

The volcano produced significant volcanic ash emissions, particularly in the earlier phases of the eruption, which impacted both ground- and satellite-based measurements. This produced underestimations in the SO2loading where ash was present, impacting the proximal plume more that the distal as the ash settles out with time. This meant that traverse measurements were more impacted, leading to a disparity in the measured fluxes from ground and space. Later, when ash emissions had decreased, the agreement between the two was much improved, with trends closely replicated between the traverse and satellite fluxes.

The initial estimates of the total SO2 emission from the eruption were 4.1 Mt from TROPOMI and 1.2 Mt from the traverse data.

These measurements formed part of the official monitoring effort, providing insights into the eruption’s evolution and informing the civil defence response throughout the eruption.

How to cite: Hayer, C., Barrancos, J., Burton, M., Rodríguez, F., Esse, B., Hernández, P., Melián, G., Padrón, E., Asensio-Ramos, M., and Pérez, N.: From up above to down below: Comparison of satellite- and ground-based observations of SO2 emissions from the 2021 eruption of Cumbre Vieja, La Palma, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-12201, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-12201, 2022.

Displays

Display file