EGU22-4204, updated on 10 Jan 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-4204
EGU General Assembly 2022
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Injection-rate control on deformation and stress of an experimental fault in granite

Yinlin Ji1, Lei Wang2, Hannes Hofmann1, Grzegorz Kwiatek2, and Georg Dresen2
Yinlin Ji et al.
  • 1Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Section 4.8 Geoenergy, Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam, Germany.
  • 2Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Section 4.2 Geomechanics and Scientific Drilling, Telegrafenberg, 14473, Potsdam, Germany

In this study, we conducted injection-driven shear tests on a sawcut fault in granite samples using a triaxial deformation apparatus. The granite samples were drilled from Odenwald basement rocks in Germany. The sawcut fault, inclined 30° to the sample axis, was ground using sandpaper with a particle size of 201 µm. Two boreholes (nominal diameter 1.8 mm) were drilled near the short edge of each sample half to allow direct fluid access to the fault surface. Eight strain gauges, and eight pairs of acoustic emission (AE) sensors attached on the sample surface were used to monitor the deformation, local strain and AE events. 

During the experiments, we first measured the peak shear strength of the faulted sample by advancing the axial piston at a constant rate of 1 µm/s under 36 MPa confining pressure and 1 MPa pore pressure. We then adjusted the shear stress to be 90% of the peak shear strength. Subsequently, the piston was fixed, and the first injection-driven shear test was initiated by injecting distilled water from the bottom borehole at a rate of 0.2 mL/min. We observed three full cycles of fast slip events until the injection pressure was increased up to approximately 18 MPa. We then reduced the pore pressure to the initial 1 MPa and the axial force was removed, followed by the second injection-driven shear test conducted at a higher injection rate of 0.8 mL/min using the same procedure as in the first test. We also observed three episodes of fast slip events until the injection pressure was increased to about 20 MPa. Fluid pressures were monitored continuously at the top and bottom boreholes. We employed a COMSOL model to obtain the time-dependent fluid pressure distribution along the sawcut fault during fluid injection.

For slow fluid injection, we find that the fault surface near the center experiences slight normal dilation and gradual shear stress release prior to the fast slip event. In contrast, for high-rate fluid injection, the same fault patch exhibits normal compaction and shear stress increase preceding fast slip. In both cases, significant normal dilation and abrupt shear stress drops were observed near the fault center during fast slip events. The distinct evolution of local fault deformation and stress are likely attributed to the distribution of slow slipping patches, as signified by the fluid pressure distribution and Mohr-Coulomb failure envelope. At slow injection rate, slow precursory slip may have occurred on the entire fault, initiating a fast slip event. In contrast, at higher rates, slow slip may have been localized around the injection port, resulting in local stress concentration beyond the slow slipping patch. Our results demonstrate that the evolution of local fault deformation and stress can be diverse in different fault patches, depending on the relative location to the fluid pressurized zone and the resulting slow slipping patch. This suggests that the strongly heterogeneous fault deformation should be considered when analyzing the precursors to injection-induced fault reactivation.

How to cite: Ji, Y., Wang, L., Hofmann, H., Kwiatek, G., and Dresen, G.: Injection-rate control on deformation and stress of an experimental fault in granite, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-4204, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-4204, 2022.