EGU22-7882
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-7882
EGU General Assembly 2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Mitigation of Seismic Hazards from Hydraulic Fracturing Using Cyclic Injection

Dima Yassine1, Alissar Yehya2,3, and Elsa Maalouf4
Dima Yassine et al.
  • 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Maroun Semaan Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, American University of Beirut, Lebanon (djy02@mail.aub.edu)
  • 2Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Maroun Semaan Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, American University of Beirut, Lebanon (ay36@aub.edu.lb)
  • 3Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA (ay36@aub.edu.lb)
  • 4Baha and Walid Bassatne Department of Chemical Engineering and Advanced Energy, Maroun Semaan Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, American University of Beirut, Lebanon (em40@aub.edu.lb)

Hydraulic Fracturing (HF) aims at enhancing the permeability of oil and gas production reservoirs by injecting fluids at high pressures into the formation. However, this practice has been a concern to researchers; it causes perturbation to the underground system, alters the pressures and stresses along the nearby dormant faults, and may therefore, induce earthquakes under specific conditions. In this work, we study the efficacy of using a newly emerging technique, Cyclic Hydraulic Fracturing (CHF), to reduce the risk of induced seismicity while efficiently enhancing the reservoir permeability. Instead of injecting the fluid all at once at a high pressure during each stage, CHF increases the connectivity of the reservoir by injecting the same volume in a stage through different cycles. Each cycle represents a pressurization (injection) phase and a depressurization (zero-injection) phase. The effect of CHF on the stability of a fault at a close proximity to the HF operations is assessed using different injection strategies: conventional HF (constant injection per stage) and 2 CHF schemes (3 or 5 cycles per stage). For each strategy, we calculate the Coulomb Failure Stress (CFS) and the rate of seismicity along the fault using a 2D Finite Element poroelastic model. Our numerical simulations show that CHF delays the pore pressure diffusion along the fault due to the depressurization phases that allow the relaxation of the pore fluid pressure. It also reduces the seismicity rate on the fault when compared to conventional HF. Our results suggest that the mitigation of induced seismicity is possible by using a CHF procedure optimized to reduce the seismicity rate i.e., optimized number of cycles and pressurization/depressurization periods. This development paves a way to exploit sites that are abandoned due to seismic hazards.

How to cite: Yassine, D., Yehya, A., and Maalouf, E.: Mitigation of Seismic Hazards from Hydraulic Fracturing Using Cyclic Injection, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-7882, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-7882, 2022.