Improving the global modeling of soils in JULES and the Unified Model: Updating from UM/HWSD to SoilGrids soil properties and from the Brooks & Corey to the van Genuchten soil-hydraulics model
- 1University of Reading, Dept. of Meteorology, Reading, United Kingdom
- 2University of Reading, Dept. of Geography & Environmental Science, Reading, United Kingdom
- 3National Centre for Atmospheric Science (NCAS), United Kingdom
- 4Met Office, Exeter, United Kingdom
- 5Bureau of Meteorology, Australia
- 6University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
- 7UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (UKCEH), Wallingford, United Kingdom
- 8Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- 9Universidad Nacional del Litoral, Santa Fe, Argentina
We have updated the soil properties used in JULES (Joint UK Land Environment Simulator), which is the land-surface component of the UM (Unified Model, the UK Met Office’s climate model). JULES models the interaction of the land surface with the atmosphere, and simulates the energy, water, and carbon fluxes. JULES allows either: (i) the Brooks & Corey (BC) model for estimating soil hydraulic properties, or (ii) the van Genuchten (VG) model but using hydraulic parameters translated from the BC model. One advantage of the VG model over the BC model is the smoother dependence of water retention upon matric potential for nearly saturated soils. Herein, we report on our work towards fully implementing the VG model in JULES and in the UM, through the implementation and evaluation of several VG pedotransfer functions (PTFs) for estimating the soil hydraulic parameters used in the hydraulic functions.
We have tested three VG PTFs in global offline JULES runs (driven with WFDEI data over 1979-2012): the combination of Tóth et al. PTFs 17 & 20, the Weynants et al. PTF, and the Zhang & Schaap ROSETTA3 H1 PTF (modified for sandy soils). We also modernized the soil basic properties that are conventionally used for JULES and the UM, from the UM version of the Harmonized World Soil Database (HWSD) to the SoilGrids database.
Evaluation of JULES simulations shows (i) that the modified version of the Zhang & Schaap ROSETTA3 H1 PTF is the best VG option, and (ii) that it compares favorably with the BC control model (which uses the Cosby et al. PTF and the UM/HWSD soils), in terms of the surface energy balance and the mitigation of near-surface temperature biases over mid-latitude continental regions. This modified version of the Zhang & Schaap ROSETTA3 H1 PTF with SoilGrids soils is also currently being used in coupled land-atmosphere UM runs.
How to cite: McGuire, P. C., Vidale, P. L., Best, M. J., Case, D. H., Dharssi, I., Duran Rojas, M. C., Hatcher, R. S., Lister, G. M. S., Martinez de la Torre, A., Montzka, C., Müller, O. V., Predoi, V., Robertson, E., Todt, M., Verhoef, A., and Wilson, S. S.: Improving the global modeling of soils in JULES and the Unified Model: Updating from UM/HWSD to SoilGrids soil properties and from the Brooks & Corey to the van Genuchten soil-hydraulics model, 3rd ISMC Conference ─ Advances in Modeling Soil Systems, online, 18–22 May 2021, ISMC2021-63, https://doi.org/10.5194/ismc2021-63, 2021.
