Yvonne Messerschmidt, Christine Fahrenholz, Bernd Förster, Kim-Marisa Mayer, Florian Panitz, André Rübel, Tobias Wengorsch, Phillip Kreye, Anne Bartetzko, Jens Wolf, and Wolfram Rühaak
The Federal Company for Radioactive Waste Disposal (BGE) is responsible for implementing and performing the Site Selection Procedure in Germany. The Site Selection Procedure consists of three phases. During Step 1 of Phase I, ninety sub-areas that have favorable geological conditions for safe disposal for one million years were identified. The sub-areas cover approximately 54 % of Germany and are located in three different host rocks: claystone, rock salt (halite), and crystalline rock.
In Step 2 of Phase I, which is currently in progress, the ninety sub-areas will be reduced to a limited number of smaller areas that are suitable for exploration. Within this step, so-called representative preliminary safety assessments (rvSU) are applied. These include an evaluation that the safe containment of radioactive waste for the expected evolutions can be achieved. A maximum limit of a fraction of 10-4 in total and a fraction of 10-9 annually of both the mass and number of atoms over 1 million years is allowed to be released outside the containment-providing rock zone. A quantitative method was developed based on a 1D finite-differences code for modeling the transport of radionuclides in the subsurface. This method is only suitable for claystones. Rock salt is considered impermeable, and the models do not apply with the data at hand. For crystalline rocks, the currently available data is not sufficient for transport modeling as well.
As an alternative approach to transport modeling, a qualitative method was developed. The EVENT method (Evaluation of developments in the rvSU) evaluates the impact of geogenic processes on the safety functions of the geological barriers (host rock and overburden). Safety functions are defined within the preliminary safety concept. They include geometry – for example, thickness – or hydraulic properties. Geogenic processes include glacial processes, erosion, or volcanism. They are described in FEP (features, events, processes) – catalogues, which are comprehensive, structured descriptions of a repository system and the interactions and dependencies of processes and components. To carry out the evaluation, the assessment period of 1 million years is subdivided into four periods, the cooling phase of the containers, the rest of the current interglacial period, the first glacial period, and the rest of the assessment period. Continuation of the glacial cycles as in the Pleistocene is expected.
The impact of each process on the safety functions is assessed for each period. Not all processes will take place during all periods. Processes can have a positive effect on the safety functions; however, this case is documented but not taken into account for the assessment. Negative impacts are classified (and justified) as “negligible,” “significant,” or “very significant.” In case of the occurrence of a very significant negative impact or a considerable number of significant negative impacts, the safe containment is not ensured for the area.
Assessment tables were set up for each host rock first and are adjusted for each area during the rvSU. All assessments are documented and stored in a sophisticated in-house database.