T4a | Impact of climate events and processes on radioactive waste management
Impact of climate events and processes on radioactive waste management
Main Session Organizers: Leonie Peti, Astrid Göbel, Axel Liebscher, Wolfram Rühaak
Orals
| Thu, 18 Sep, 11:40–12:40 (CEST)|Room Seminar ship
Posters
| Attendance Thu, 18 Sep, 17:20–18:20 (CEST)|Poster area
Orals |
Thu, 11:40
Thu, 17:20
Events and processes due to climatic developments are relevant for assessing the safety of a repository for nuclear waste including operational safety of e.g. surface installations and long-term safety of a deep geological repository (DGR). Short-term events, such as floods or storms, may impact transport infrastructure and surface installations. Long-term processes, such as glacial erosion, subglacial valley formation or permafrost thawing/freezing as results of certain climate states modify the setting of the overburden and can potentially even impact the geological barrier of a DGR. The investigation of the impact of such events and processes on the safe containment of the radioactive waste when describing the safety case is paramount and ongoing in the international context but still challenging due to uncertainties regarding the future climate evolution. Nevertheless, such future climate scenarios are required as part of the FEP analysis (Features, Events and Processes) for estimating the performance of a repository. Research is also being undertaken to better understand the influence of recent (anthropogenic) climate change on the long-term evolution of expected climate patterns as a basis for estimating future climate scenarios and their impact on repository safety.
This session shall combine a broad array of presentations on the effects of climate events and processes of relevance to the safety of radioactive waste management on all relevant timescales – from operational safety to long-term safety, for all waste types, and for all disposal concepts. Theoretical and experimental or field based works are equally welcome in this session.

Orals: Thu, 18 Sep, 11:40–12:40 | Room Seminar ship

11:40–12:00
|
safeND2025-3
Gernot Thuma and Christian Strack

For nuclear facilities, external hazards are major contributors to the overall risk. Due to global warming, the frequency and intensity of certain types of external hazards may change. This holds, in particular, for hydrological and meteorological hazards. Therefore, GRS assess the climatic changes to be expected in Central Europe over the coming decades and their effects on the safety of nuclear power plants (NPPS), interim storage facilities and repositories for nuclear waste (during their operation phase) in the framework of the research project “Einfluss des Klimawandels auf die Sicherheit kerntechnischer Anlagen” (KlimakA) funded by BASE.

At the beginning of the project, a literature review on climate projections for Central Europe has been performed. The focus of this review was on information regarding extreme events with low exceedance frequencies, because this type of events is most relevant from a safety point of view. Depending on the facilities under consideration different time horizons are of interest: While for European NPPs the focus is on the next 60 to 80 years, for interim storage facilities and repositories longer time scales, up to well into the 22nd century, are of interest. The study led to the following insights: (i) Climate projections are subject to large uncertainties. (ii) Evaluations with respect to events with low exceedance probabilities are scarce. (iii) Projections for changes beyond the current century are almost non-existent. (iv) With the exception of temperature increase, changes of hydrological and meteorological effects due to climate change will be limited for most central European countries.

Based on an evaluation of the worldwide NPP operating experience, a review of the design of European NPPs with respect to external hazards and considering the WENRA requirement to protect NPPs against hazards with return periods of 10.000 years, there is currently no indication of a major increase of the overall risk due to climate change. Nevertheless, operational challenges may arise. Hazards predominantly contributing to safety related effects are lightning strikes, high winds, biological hazards, low temperatures, and flooding events.

As interim storage facilities are less dependent on active systems than NPPs, their safety will probably be even less affected by climate change. One caveat being that climate projections beyond 2100 are scares and depend on uncertain assumptions. But as the pertinent design requirements for interim storage facilities are similarly high as those for NPPs, a high level of robustness of interim storage facilities can be expected. Similar considerations hold for the surface installations of repositories which will be assessed in the next step of KlimakA.

How to cite: Thuma, G. and Strack, C.: Climate Change in Central Europe and its Effects on External Hazards for Nuclear Facilities, Third interdisciplinary research symposium on the safety of nuclear disposal practices, Berlin, Germany, 17–19 Sep 2025, safeND2025-3, https://doi.org/10.5194/safend2025-3, 2025.

12:00–12:20
|
safeND2025-79
Marc Johnen, Judith Flügge, Klaus Fischer-Appelt, Frank Charlier, Jens Wolf, and Philipp Horenburg

Over the assessment period of one million years, a repository for high-level radioactive waste (HAW) will be influenced by a multitude of processes and developments that must be considered when designing the repository. One such development is the climate, whose influences are highly dynamic and complex. To address these challenges, further research is required for global climate modelling using “Earth system Models of Intermediate Complexity” (EMICS) and in far-field modelling of potential repository sites in Germany. In this work far-field groundwater models are set up to estimate climate and parameter uncertainties to characterise and document the effects, and to show how or to what extent these uncertainties can be reduced in accordance with the requirements of EndlSiUntV §11.

The climatic states most relevant to the radionuclide transport in the far-field were identified and modelled using different boundary conditions. Groundwater models were set up and run for temperate climate, glaciation, permafrost, the presence of erosion valleys and sea level rise. A generic geological model from previous projects was used as the basis for modelling a potential repository site in claystone (Reinhold et al. 2013). The flow and transport processes of advection, density-driven flow, dispersion, diffusion, sorption and decay were implemented using the code “distributed density-driven flow (d3f++)” (Schneider et al. 2023, Fein 2004, Fein & Schneider 1999). The pollutant transport from the repository into the surrounding geological layers is modelled and evaluated at observation points. In addition, the mass integrals of the various model units are used to analyse the mass flow out of the host rock according to §4 section 5 of the EndlSiAnfV.

Simulations are carried out for different climate states and parameter variations in order to quantify their influence on the radionuclide distribution in the far-field. The results show a low influence of the climatic states and a significant influence of the diffusion as the primary transport process in the clay rock and the sorption as a strong retarding process. Only for low diffusion coefficients the hydraulic gradient affect the transport velocities. Site selection must be preceded by sufficiently good exploration to determine the rock properties as well as possible in order to be able to provide a robust safety case for the repository in the future.

References

Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, und nukleare Sicherheit (BMUV) (2020): Endlagersicherheitsanforderungsverordnung - EndlSiAnfV. BGBl. I S. 2094.

Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, und nukleare Sicherheit (BMUV) (2020): Endlagersicherheitsuntersuchungsverordnung - EndlSiUntV. BGBl. I S. 2094, 2103.

Fein, Eckard; Schneider, Anke (1999): d3f – Ein Programmpaket zur Modellierung von Dichteströmungen. Abschlussbericht. GRS-139. Braunschweig.

Reinhold, Klaus; Jahn, Steffen; Kühnlenz, Tatjana, Ptock, Lennart, Sönnke, Jürgen (2013): Methodenentwicklung und Anwendung eines Sicherheitsnachweiskonzeptes für einen generischen HAW-Endlagerstandort im Tonstein (AnSichT). Endlagerstandortmodell Nord (AnSichT) - Teil I: Beschreibung des geologischen Endlagerstandortmodells. Zwischenbericht. BGR. Hannover.

Schneider, Anke; Conen, Niklas Paul; Gehrke, Anne; Hilbert, Julian; Knodel, Markus M.; Kröhn, Klaus-Peter et al. (2023): HYMNE - hydrogeological modelling at a regional scale. GRS-750. Braunschweig.

How to cite: Johnen, M., Flügge, J., Fischer-Appelt, K., Charlier, F., Wolf, J., and Horenburg, P.: What matters more: Climate or parameters? A closer look at uncertainties in groundwater modelling, Third interdisciplinary research symposium on the safety of nuclear disposal practices, Berlin, Germany, 17–19 Sep 2025, safeND2025-79, https://doi.org/10.5194/safend2025-79, 2025.

12:20–12:40
|
safeND2025-52
Leonie Peti, Koen Beerten, Alexis Geisler-Roblin, Jin Park, Agnieszka Strusińska-Correia, Vanessa Montoya, Karl Van Zweel, Maia Vercelli, and Alvaro M. Sainz-García

The strategic study "CLIMATE: Impact of Climate Change on Nuclear Waste Management" is part of the European Partnership on Radioactive Waste Management (EURAD-2) and runs from October 2024 to September 2026.

The primary objective of this study is to identify knowledge gaps and provide recommendations for future research on the impact of climate change on radioactive waste management (RWM) facilities and sites across Europe. CLIMATE addresses all types of waste and storage systems (low level to high level waste; surface to deep storage). The entire lifetime of the disposal facility will be considered, i.e.,  construction, operation, as well as long-term post-closure phases, while pre-disposal facilities will also be included. A secondary goal of CLIMATE is to conduct a comprehensive assessment of existing regulatory and institutional frameworks on climate change impacts on RWM facilities, identifying gaps and needs while offering recommendations for future actions. Furthermore, CLIMATE aims to foster collaboration with civil society and stakeholders, by integrating societal concerns and insights into the development of climate resilience strategies for nuclear waste management and emphasising the importance of transparent communication as well as stakeholder involvement in the research and implementation process.

Short-term climate scenarios that may impact construction and operational RWM phases include especially extreme events such as extreme precipitation, which can lead to severe floods and landslides, extreme storm events or temperature increases with subsequent higher wildfire risk.

Long-term climate scenarios, which are relevant for the post-closure phase and which could compromise the integrity of radioactive waste repositories over time, include mainly changes in temperature conditions (global warming and global cooling including permafrost development and ice sheet advances), the geomorphological evolution of the region, sea level changes and hydrogeological shifts.

Assessments of these scenarios and their safety relevance are being conducted based on selected cases representing diverse European climate zones as well as different facilities (pre-disposal/processing vs. final disposal) and waste types (low-/intermediate vs. high-level radioactive waste). In the next step, CLIMATE will also make a selection of natural analogues that represent expected/possible future climate conditions to improve safety assessments for the long-term containment of radioactive materials.

As part of the large EURAD-2 partnership, CLIMATE is challenged but mostly enriched by combining different perspectives of all involved actors: waste management organisations (WMO), research entities (RE) and technical support organisations (TSO) as well as civil society organisations. The outcomes of this strategic study will provide valuable recommendations for policymakers, regulators, and the scientific community, contributing to the development of safety-oriented and effective strategies for radioactive waste management in the context of short-term (decades and centuries) and long-term (millenia and longer) climate change.

How to cite: Peti, L., Beerten, K., Geisler-Roblin, A., Park, J., Strusińska-Correia, A., Montoya, V., Van Zweel, K., Vercelli, M., and Sainz-García, A. M.: Impact of Climate Change on Nuclear Waste Management, Third interdisciplinary research symposium on the safety of nuclear disposal practices, Berlin, Germany, 17–19 Sep 2025, safeND2025-52, https://doi.org/10.5194/safend2025-52, 2025.

Posters: Thu, 18 Sep, 17:20–18:20 | Poster area

P16
|
safeND2025-61
Hailong Sheng, Markus Schedel, Hung Pham, Christoph Schüth, Ingo Sass, and Wolfram Rühaak

The long-term safety assessment of high-level radioactive waste repositories must account for climate changes over the next million years. During this period, the Earth's surface will undergo up to 10 glacial-interglacial cycles, where glacial activity and permafrost formation/melting will cause repeated phase transitions of water within rock pores and fractures. These freeze-thaw processes induce volumetric expansion and contraction in the geological strata, leading to complex thermal–hydraulic–mechanical coupling effects that can impact both geological and engineered barriers. A comprehensive understanding of these processes is essential for assessing the long-term safety of radioactive waste repositories.

This study utilizes a modified triaxial testing system to investigate the relationship between freeze-thaw-induced volume changes of sandstone and key influencing factors, such as porosity, permeability, temperature, and saturation. Furthermore, this research will be extended to examine the effects of freeze-thaw cycles on consolidated materials (e.g., granite and mudstone) and unconsolidated materials (e.g., clay and sand).

The experimental results will be used for three-dimensional finite element modeling, enabling the simulation of volumetric changes in rock subjected to freeze-thaw cycles by refining thermo-hydro-mechanical (THM) processes within the OpenGeoSys (OGS) framework. In the future, this simulation will be further extended to the hydrogeological scale, where a catchment model will be developed to evaluate the impact of glacial cycles on regional groundwater flow dynamics and assess their cumulative effects.

By integrating experimental analysis, numerical simulations, and hydrogeological modeling, this study proposes a systematic framework for performing safety assessments of glacial-interglacial scenarios. The findings will enhance the scientific understanding of subsurface processes.

Keywords: volume change, permafrost, glaciation, safety assessment, radioactive waste repository, freeze-thaw cycles, finite element modeling, groundwater flow

How to cite: Sheng, H., Schedel, M., Pham, H., Schüth, C., Sass, I., and Rühaak, W.: Evaluation of Volume Change Due to Freeze-Thaw Cycles in Nuclear Waste Repository Safety Assessment, Third interdisciplinary research symposium on the safety of nuclear disposal practices, Berlin, Germany, 17–19 Sep 2025, safeND2025-61, https://doi.org/10.5194/safend2025-61, 2025.

P17
|
safeND2025-103
Maximilian Pfaff, Tobias Wengorsch, Yvonne Messerschmidt, Paulina Müller, Anne Bartetzko, and Nadine Schöner

The Site Selection Procedure for a repository for high-level radioactive waste in Germany consists of three phases. During Step 1 of Phase I, ninety sub-areas that cover 54% of Germany were identified. In the current Step 2 of Phase I, the ninety sub-areas will be reduced to a limited number of smaller areas. Within this step, so-called representative preliminary safety assessments (rvSU) are applied. During the rvSU, consecutive sets of criteria are applied in four evaluation steps to assess the extent to which the safe containment of radioactive waste can be expected in the areas for a period of one million years.

Safety assessments include the evaluation of potential impact of geological processes on the integrity of the geological barriers of a repository. A prominent process to consider is subglacial erosion, which leads to characteristic overdeepenings and glacial tunnel valleys. Such features were formed during the last glaciations during the Pleistocene in the North German Basin and the alpine Foreland. Subglacial overdeepenings can reach depths of over 500 m. They are formed by basal meltwater, which runs off under a glacier and can lead to deep channels being cut into the subsurface. During the erosion that leads to their formation, large quantities of sediment are transported away within short geological periods.

Therefore, they pose a potential threat to the integrity of the geological barriers of a repository, the overburden and the host rock.

The German Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (BGR) has mapped the occurrence of subglacial overdeepenings in northern Germany (Breuer et al. 2023). On this basis, predictions were made about the extent and erosion potential of future overdeepenings. The result is a depth zone map, which shows the occurrence of overdeepenings in five zones, with the zone of the deepest expected structures having depths between 400 and 600 m below sea level. The continuation of the glacial cycles as observed in the Pleistocene is expected for the next one million years.

The occurrence of glacial overdeepenings is considered in several of the evaluation steps during the rvSU. The depth of influence of glacial overdeepenings can reach deeper than the legally prescribed minimum depth of 300 m, which is why the minimum required depth for areas with expected glacial overdeepenings is set deeper in the first evaluation step. The second evaluation step applies a further safety margin. In evaluation step 3, subglacial erosion is considered with the derivation of expected evolutions and the quantitative assessment. In evaluation step 4, the distance between the base of the overdeepening and the potential containment providing rock zone is considered, as well as the occurrence of erosion resistant strata, which should pose a hindrance of the formation to subglacial overdeepenings.

 

References:

 

Breuer, S.; Bebiolka, A.; Noack, V.; Lang, J. (2023): The past is the key to the future – considering Pleistocene subglacial erosion for the minimum depth of a radioactive waste repository. E&G Quaternary Science Journal, Bd. 72 (1). S. 113 – 125. ISSN 04247116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/egqsj-72-113-2023

How to cite: Pfaff, M., Wengorsch, T., Messerschmidt, Y., Müller, P., Bartetzko, A., and Schöner, N.: Depth of a potential repository with regard to the influence of subglacial overdeepenings and tunnel valleys in the representative preliminary safety assessments, Third interdisciplinary research symposium on the safety of nuclear disposal practices, Berlin, Germany, 17–19 Sep 2025, safeND2025-103, https://doi.org/10.5194/safend2025-103, 2025.