Posters HS2.1.7
|
HS2.1.7 What is a «good» hydrological model for impact study? |
| Convener: Alexander Gelfan | Co-Conveners: Vazken Andréassian , Valentina Krysanova , Yury Motovilov |
|
Posters
/ Attendance Thu, 12 Apr, 17:30–19:00
|
|
Attendance Time: Thursday, 12 April 2018, 17:30–19:00 Hall A Chairperson: Alexander Gelfan |
|
|
"End of democracy era" in hydrological modeling |
|
|
Hall A |
|
|
A.13
|
EGU2018-17350
The good, the bad or the ugly? Under what conditions can we trust our models for impact studies? Highlight Guillaume Thirel, Vazken Andréassian, and Charles Perrin |
|
A.14
|
EGU2018-4189
How good is good in hydrological modelling? Jan Seibert, Marc Vis, Elizabeth Lewis, and Ilja van Meerveld |
|
A.15
|
EGU2018-8735
Performance of hydrological models in the historical period and credibility of climate impact projections Valentina Krysanova, Chantal Donnelly, Alexander Gelfan, Dieter Gerten, Berit Arheimer, Fred Hattermann, and Zbigniew Kundzewicz |
|
A.16
|
EGU2018-12512
How to distinguish between hydrological models appropriate for impact studies and unsuitable models? Crash-test necessity Alexander Gelfan |
|
What is a "good" model conceptualization? |
|
|
A.17
|
EGU2018-6499
The Decisive Role of Model Complexity in Model Selection Marvin Höge, Thomas Wöhling, and Wolfgang Nowak |
|
A.18
|
EGU2018-13718
Can conceptual hydrological models be used under changing conditions? Andràs Bàrdossy and Faizan Anwar |
|
A.19
|
EGU2018-7529
Expansion of the capabilities of conceptual hydrological models on the basis of physically based models Yury Motovilov |
|
A.20
|
EGU2018-11989
Effective combination of stochastic and deterministic hydrological models in a changing environment Andreas Efstratiadis, Ioannis Nalbantis, and Demetris Koutsoyiannis |
|
A.21
|
EGU2018-14689
Do we need to represent the non-stationary world in hydrological impact models? Ian Holman, Simona Pedde, and Calum Brown |
|
What are "good" evaluation tests and performance criteria? |
|
|
A.22
|
EGU2018-9423
Do good simulation performances at gauged stations mean good semi-distributed hydrological model? An analysis for prediction in ungauged basins. Alban de Lavenne, Guillaume Thirel, Vazken Andréassian, Charles Perrin, and Maria-Helena Ramos |
|
A.23
|
EGU2018-12053
Evaluating model performance: a non-parametric variant of the Kling-Gupta efficiency Sandra Pool, Marc Vis, and Jan Seibert |
|
A.24
|
EGU2018-16647
'Crash testing' calibrated HBV model parameters under contrasting flood seasonality conditions Klaus Vormoor, Maik Heistermann, Axel Bronstert, and Deborah Lawrence |
| A.25 |
EGU2018-439
A Comprehensive Hydrologic Model Evaluation based on Multitemporal Model Performance (withdrawn) Andrijana Todorović and Jasna Plavšić |
|
A.26
|
EGU2018-9470
Exploring the validity of a regionalised hydrological model at various spatial scales Thibault Hallouin, Michael Bruen, and Eva Mockler |
|
A.27
|
EGU2018-19509
A multi-model cross-scale study to quantify sources of uncertainty in hydrological climate change impact assessment Fred Fokko Hattermann, Tobias Vetter, and Valentina Krysanova |
|
A.28
|
EGU2018-8537
Impacts of Hydrologic Model Uncertainty on Water Resources Management William Farmer |
|
A.29
|
EGU2018-5642
How to improve the water balance error to obtain robust streamflow simulation: a comparative approach using three hydrological models Dereje Birhanu, Hyeonjun Kim, and Cheolhee Jang |