Cenozoic sea-level and cryospheric evolution from deep-sea geochemical and continental margin records
- Department of Earth & Planetary Sciences and Institute of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA (kgm@eps.rutgers.edu)
Cenozoic (past ~66 Myr) sea-level history reflects temperature changes and cryospheric evolution of the Earth from essentially ice-free conditions in the Early Eocene to bipolar ice sheets in the Quaternary. We derived a global mean sea level (GMSL) estimate for the Cenozoic using a new astronomically calibrated Pacific benthic foraminiferal δ18O splice from published records and a 2 Myr-smoothed Pacific bottom water temperature record based on published benthic foraminiferal Mg/Ca data. Our GMSL estimates are similar to sea-level estimates derived from “backstripping” (progressively accounting for compaction, loading and thermal subsidence) of cores from the mid-Atlantic U.S. continental margin. Peak global warmth, elevated GMSL, high CO2, and largely ice-free conditions occurred during the Early Eocene “Hothouse.” During the Middle-Late Eocene “Cool Greenhouse,” small ice sheets associated with lower atmospheric CO2 drove sea-level changes. Continental-scale ice sheets began in the Oligocene “Icehouse” (ca. 34 Ma), a permanent East Antarctic ice sheet began in the middle Middle Miocene (ca. 12.8 Ma), and full, bipolar glaciation began in the Quaternary (ca. 2.55 Ma). The Last Glacial Maximum (20-27 ka) was the largest lowering of GMSL (~130 m) of the Mesozoic-Cenozoic and GMSL rise during last deglaciation (ca. 19-10 ka) exceeded 40-45 mm/yr. Sea-level rise progressively slowed from 10 ka to 2 ka and was then at stillstand until late 19th to early 20th century when rates began to rise. Despite large uncertainties in proxies, our study reaffirms that throughout the Cenozoic, high long-term (107-year scale) CO2 was associated with warm climates and high sea levels. However, sea level-change was dominated by periodic, astronomically controlled (10’s kyr-Myr scale) Milankovitch variations superimposed upon longer-term changes driven by CO2.
How to cite: Miller, K., Browning, J., Schmelz, W. J., Kopp, R., Mountain, G., and Wright, J.: Cenozoic sea-level and cryospheric evolution from deep-sea geochemical and continental margin records, EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-10017, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-10017, 2020
Comments on the display
AC: Author Comment | CC: Community Comment | Report abuse
Excellent work. I have two questions want to consult you:
1. Can Oxygen isotope be used to reconstructed 1st-2nd global sea-level changes?
2. I am curiou about why oxygen isotope can indicated eustatic changes even in a largely ice-free time (such as PETM)?
I am curious about why oxygen isotope can indicate eustatic changes even in a largely ice-free time (such as PETM)?
Our estimates older than 48 Ma are equivocal as indicated. However, we strongly argue for significant glaciation (>15 m on Myr scale( from 48 Ma onward. We suspect that sea-level changes of ~15-20 m from 48-66 Ma were driven by ice volume changes
The resolution of Oxygen isotope is higher than temperature, why the temperature can directly used to reconstruct sea water oxygen isotope?
Question: Can Oxygen isotopes be used to reconstructed 1st-2nd global sea-level changes?
Response: If by first-order you mean 10-100 Myr scale, no. We see no evidence for pacing on so-called second-order scale. Rather, sea level was paced primarily by the 1.2 Myr tilt cycle and also by the 2.4 Myr very long eccentricity cycles.
Boulila, S., Galbrun, B., Miller, K.G., Pekar, S.F., Browning, J.V., Laskar, J., and Wright, J.D., 2011, On the origin of Cenozoic and Mesozoic “third-order” eustatic sequences: Earth Science Reviews, v. 109, p. 94-112.
Miller, K.G., Browning, J.V., Schmelz, W.J, Kopp, R.E., Mountain, G.S., and Wright, J.D., 2020, Cenozoic sea-level and cryospheric evolution from deep-sea geochemical and continental margin records, Science Advances (in press).
Question: Can Oxygen isotopes be used to reconstructed 1st-2nd global sea-level changes?
Response: If by first-order you mean 10-100 Myr scale, no. We see no evidence for pacing on so-called second-order scale. Rather, sea level was paced primarily by the 1.2 Myr tilt cycle and also by the 2.4 Myr very long eccentricity cycles.
Boulila, S., Galbrun, B., Miller, K.G., Pekar, S.F., Browning, J.V., Laskar, J., and Wright, J.D., 2011, On the origin of Cenozoic and Mesozoic “third-order” eustatic sequences: Earth Science Reviews, v. 109, p. 94-112.
Miller, K.G., Browning, J.V., Schmelz, W.J, Kopp, R.E., Mountain, G.S., and Wright, J.D., 2020, Cenozoic sea-level and cryospheric evolution from deep-sea geochemical and continental margin records, Science Advances (in press).
Question: Can Oxygen isotopes be used to reconstructed 1st-2nd global sea-level changes?
Response: If by first-order you mean 10-100 Myr scale, no. We see no evidence for pacing on so-called second-order scale. Rather, sea level was paced primarily by the 1.2 Myr tilt cycle and also by the 2.4 Myr very long eccentricity cycles.
Boulila, S., Galbrun, B., Miller, K.G., Pekar, S.F., Browning, J.V., Laskar, J., and Wright, J.D., 2011, On the origin of Cenozoic and Mesozoic “third-order” eustatic sequences: Earth Science Reviews, v. 109, p. 94-112.
Miller, K.G., Browning, J.V., Schmelz, W.J, Kopp, R.E., Mountain, G.S., and Wright, J.D., 2020, Cenozoic sea-level and cryospheric evolution from deep-sea geochemical and continental margin records, Science Advances (in press).
Hi Ken!
Very clear presentation, thank you for sharing that. You neatly show that Cenozoic sea-level events are modulated by the long-term 1.2 Myr tilt and 2.4 Myr eccentricity cycles.
But the largest amplitude modulation seem to occur at even longer timescales (107 year scale). And throughout the last ~35 million year they seem to have some kind of rhythmicity, with a periodicity of ~9 to ~12 Myr. You ascribe these very slow, but high amplitude sea-level variations to CO2 forcing, right? Do you think even longer eccentricity periods might have to do something with that? Similar as what Martinez and Dera (2015, PNAS) suggested for the Mesozoic? Or is this just red noise, after all there is plenty of red-noise processes in Earth's climate system?
Cheers from Bremen,
David.
David
Great to hear from you. There are lo frequencies in the signal, though to quote John Schmelz "It does look like there is a low frequency signal. I think it is difficult to tell exactly what the signal is." That said we will try lo pass filtering and reanalysis to test for the 9 and 30 Myr periods. Nice point. Ken