EGU2020-10470
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-10470
EGU General Assembly 2020
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Interactive Aerosol Feedbacks on Photolysis Rates in the GEM-MACH Air Quality Model for an Athabasca Oil-Sands Modelling Study

Mahtab Majdzadeh, Craig Stroud, Ayodeji Akingunola, Paul Makar, Christopher Sioris, Chris McLinden, Xiaoyi Zhao, Michael Moran, and Ihab Abboud
Mahtab Majdzadeh et al.
  • Environment and Climate Change Canada, Air Quality Research Division, Canada (mahtab.majdzadeh@canada.ca)

The radiative transfer module of an on-line chemical transport models requires input data from aerosol extinction efficiency, single scatter albedo and asymmetry factor, in order to predict the radiative state of the atmosphere. These aerosol optical properties (aerosol optical depth, AOD), may be integrated vertically for comparison to satellite observations. These optical effects may also influence the shorter wavelengths associated with atmospheric gas photolysis, influencing atmospheric reactivity. These processes may be harmonized in an on-line reaction transport model, such as Environment and Climate Change Canada’s GEM-MACH (GEM: Global Environmental Multi-scale – MACH: Modelling Air quality and Chemistry). Previous photolysis routine in the radiative transfer module, MESSY-JVAL (Modular Earth Sub-Model System), in GEM-MACH, made use of a climatology of aerosol optical properties, and the previous on-line version made use of a homogeneous mixture Mie code for meteorological radiative transfer calculations.

We calculated a new lookup table for the extinction efficiency, absorption and scattering cross sections of each aerosol type. The new version of MESSY-JVAL uses GEM-MACH predicted aerosol size distributions, chemical composition and relative humidity in each vertical column at each time step as input, reads aerosol absorption and scattering cross section data from the new lookup table and calculates aerosol optical properties, that are then used to modify both photolysis and meteorological radiative transfer calculations.

In order to evaluate these modifications to the model, we performed a series of simulations with GEM-MACH with wildfire emissions inputs from the Canadian Forest Fire Emissions Prediction System (CFFEPS) and compared the model AOD output with satellite and AERONET (Aerosol Robotic Network) measurement data. Comparison of the hourly AERONET and monthly-averaged satellite AOD demonstrates major improvements in the revised model AOD predictions. The impact of the updated photolysis rates and meteorological radiative transfer calculations on predictions of oxidant mixing ratios and rates of pollutant oxidation (nitrogen dioxide conversion to nitric acid) will be assessed both within and below the forest fire plume.

How to cite: Majdzadeh, M., Stroud, C., Akingunola, A., Makar, P., Sioris, C., McLinden, C., Zhao, X., Moran, M., and Abboud, I.: Interactive Aerosol Feedbacks on Photolysis Rates in the GEM-MACH Air Quality Model for an Athabasca Oil-Sands Modelling Study, EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-10470, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-10470, 2020.