EGU2020-10480, updated on 10 Jan 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-10480
EGU General Assembly 2020
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Atmospheric methane monitoring and analysis using tropOMI retrievals at ECMWF.

Jerome Barre1, Ilse Aben2, Melanie Ades1, Anna Agusti-Panareda1, Gianpaolo Balsamo1, Nicolas Bousserez1, Margarita Choulga1, Richard Engelen1, Johannes Flemming1, Antje Inness1, Zak Kipling1, Jochen Landgraf2, Alba Lorente-Delgado2, Sebastien Massart1, Joe McNorton1, Mark Parrington, and Vincent-Henri Peuch
Jerome Barre et al.
  • 1ECMWF, Shinfield Park, Reading RG2 9AX, UK
  • 2SRON, Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Sorbonnelaan 2, 3584 CA Utrecht, Netherlands

The European Union’s Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) operationally provides daily forecasts of global atmospheric composition. It uses the ECMWF Integrated Forecasting System (IFS), which includes meteorological and atmospheric composition variables, such as reactive gases, greenhouse gases and aerosols, for its global forecasts and reanalyses. The current green-house gases operational suite monitors CH4 and CO2 and assimilates TANSO and IASI retrievals for both species. The TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) on board the Sentinel-5 Precursor (S5P) satellite launched in October 2017 yields a wealth of atmospheric composition data, including CH4 retrievals at unprecedented high horizontal resolution (7km) and up to daily revisit time. We used the IFS to perform monitoring experiments at different horizontal resolutions (25 km and 9 km). We also performed first data assimilation experiments at 25 km horizontal resolution.

This first set of monitoring experiments shows the potential of the TROPOMI CH4 retrievals to correct known biases that exist in the current CAMS analyses and forecasts. Assimilation experiments of TROPOMI CH4 shows that adding the instrument in the operational chain would significantly improve the analysis and forecasts. Detection of CH4 sources seen by TROPOMI compared to CAMS also shows the potential of the instrument to inform on and infer anthropogenic and natural sources. For example, discrepancies between TROPOMI retrievals and CAMS fields in the CH4 levels associated with oil and gas extraction activities show very promising perspectives for monitoring and analysis of CH4 concentration and emissions. We will finally discuss the challenges and progress made towards performing inversions using the IFS operational system.  

How to cite: Barre, J., Aben, I., Ades, M., Agusti-Panareda, A., Balsamo, G., Bousserez, N., Choulga, M., Engelen, R., Flemming, J., Inness, A., Kipling, Z., Landgraf, J., Lorente-Delgado, A., Massart, S., McNorton, J., Parrington, M., and Peuch, V.-H.: Atmospheric methane monitoring and analysis using tropOMI retrievals at ECMWF., EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-10480, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-10480, 2020.