EGU2020-11399
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-11399
EGU General Assembly 2020
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

AMS of strained shales fragments: a fast way to quantify the matrix damage.

Francho Gracia-Puzo1,2, Charles Aubourg1, Antonio Casas-Sainz2, and Tiphaine Boiron3
Francho Gracia-Puzo et al.
  • 1E2S UPPA, CNRS, TOTAL, LFCR, Université de Pau et Pays de l'Adour, Pau, France
  • 2Geotransfer Research Group (IUCA), Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, España
  • 3E2S UPPA, CNRS, TOTAL, DMEX, Université de Pau et Pays de l'Adour, Pau, France

With the objective of mapping strain around a thrust front in an orogenic context (Pyrenean Range), 757 shale fragments (0.7-6.2 g) have been collected in 49 sites. Scalar data (degree of anisotropy P and shape parameter T), together with ellipse of confidence of individual axes provide a proxy of strain acquired by shales in the footwall of the main thrust (Saur et al. 2020).

Normally, sampling is done by two methods: collecting oriented decimetric hand specimens; or drilling 2.5 cm diameter cylinders. This presents the advantage to deal with oriented samples. However, those techniques are time consuming and it is difficult to collect numerous samples in loose materials like shales. On the contrary, collecting rock fragments present the net advantage to have a much better statistical description of the site. We are restricted by the dimensions of AGICO holders (8cm3 for cubes, or 10 cm3 for cylinder). It is possible to use an empty 10 cm3 cylinder, which could be filled with smaller fragments of rock. The homogeneity of magnetic field of MFK2 Kappabridge (AGICO) allows to measure sample with no distortion due to irregular shape. In addition, the automatic rotator allow a fast and precise description of the AMS tensor.

All samples belong to the Hecho Group (Eocene from Jaca Basin), consisting of cleaved or stratified marls. Rock fragments are mostly fractured according to the bedding and/or cleavage surfaces. Then we set the rock “horizontally” with the main surface parallel to the bottom of the box, to keep a geometrical reference. We assume that the anisotropy parameters P and T will maintain their values, regardless the shape and size of fragments. Rock magnetism indicates that AMS is primarily governed by illite, with little contribution of magnetite. AMS provides therefore a proxy of illite organisation within the matrix.

It is noticeable the speed with which data can be acquired in a well-known regional geological setting (757 samples, 49 sites) during 5 field work days and 17 laboratory days. About 15 fragments per site, covering few square meters, display homogenous pattern of P, T, and ellipse of confidence. The data visualization is done thanks to Anisoft 5.1 Software (Chadima, M.). We removed from analysis low susceptibility samples which are carbonate-rich and with more varieties of magnetic minerals. All sites present homogenous results at the site scale, but with significant differences with respect to strain. P and T parameters are very sensitive to strain as illite is the dominant carrier. In addition, the ellipse of confidence of minimum AMS axis (K3) provide a sensitive proxy to characterize the competition between bedding and cleavage.

This new approach is very promising, and allows much more detailed sampling in difficult area, with much more robust statistical description of scalar AMS data. Aubourg et al. (EGU, TS7.3 session) will use these data to show the pattern of strain in a ramp-related fold.

How to cite: Gracia-Puzo, F., Aubourg, C., Casas-Sainz, A., and Boiron, T.: AMS of strained shales fragments: a fast way to quantify the matrix damage., EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-11399, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-11399, 2020.