EGU2020-11475
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-11475
EGU General Assembly 2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Diffusive limitation to photosynthesis and plant-microbe N competition dominate the urban lawn response to secondary salinization

Dario Liberati1, Ramilla Brykova2, Maria Cristina Moscatelli1, Stefano Moscatello3, Emanuele Pallozzi4, and Olga Gavrichkova3
Dario Liberati et al.
  • 1Department for Innovation in Biological, Agro-food and Forest Systems, University of Tuscia, Viterbo, Italy (darioliberati@unitus.it)
  • 2Peoples Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation (ramilla0390@gmail.com)
  • 3Research Institute on Terrestrial Ecosystems, National Research Council, Porano, Italy (olga.gavrichkova@cnr.it)
  • 4Research Institute on Terrestrial Ecosystems, National Research Council, Monterotondo, Italy (emanuele.pallozzi@cnr.it)

Release of de-icing agents is the main cause of increasing soil salinization in urban and rural areas.  Grasses are the dominant vegetation in urban lawns and are exposed to different rates of soil salinization depending on the distance to the paved salt-affected surfaces. The capacity of these ecosystems to maintain C sequestration and nutrient cycling functioning depends on the sensitivity to salinization of the main players: primary producers and their interaction with microbial community.

In this mesocosm study we aimed to evaluating the impact of soil secondary salinization rates on the functioning of Lolium perenne. Salinization treatments were applied for two months in spring, irrigating the mesocosms with the commonly used de-icing agent NaCl at two concentration, 30 mM (low salinity treatment) and 90 mM (moderate salinity treatment). The leaf physiological  responses of Lolium were assessed monitoring photosynthetic rates (A), stomatal conductance (gs)  mesophyll conductance (gm), carboxylation capacity (Vcmax). Quantitative limitation analysis (QLA) was applied to calculate the relative contribution of diffusive and biochemical limitation to photosynthesis under salinization. Productivity was estimated by regular mowing of plants to 4cm height. Finally, plants were harvested and analyzed on leaf mass per area (LMA), leaf N content and 15N isotope composition. Rhizosphere soil was sampled and analyzed on the activity of enzymes involved in the cycling of C, N, S and P. 

Salinity increased LMA and leaf N, reducing  Lolium aboveground productivity. Photosynthetic rates were almost halved under both salinity treatments. QLA shows that photosynthesis was mainly limited by gm, limitation accounting for 68% and 54% of the total limitation in 30mM and 90mM, respectively. gs reduction significantly limited photosynthesis only in 90 mM (32% of total limitation), while biochemical limitations (due to a reduction in Vcmax) remained below 20% of the total limitation in both treatments.

Mesophyll conductance to CO2 depends on leaf anatomical and biochemical traits and is usually negatively related to LMA. The increased LMA observed under salinity treatments suggests that changes in the leaf structure (like increased cell wall thickness) could be responsible for most of the A (and consequently productivity) reduction.  On the other hand, the increased leaf N content is in agreement with the lack of significant reduction in Vcmax. Accumulation of N compounds in leaves in response to salinization was accompanied by a decline in soil extracellular enzymes involved in N and other cycles. Over-competing of the microbial pool in access to nutrients by vegetation could be suggested in conditions of salinization. Because the belowground biomass was not affected, decline in C losses with salinization could be hypothesize which should balance the shortage in C inputs.     

In conclusion, salinization mainly limited A through gm limitation, probably associated  to the increased LMA. At the same time, altering the capacity of the microbial pool to compete for N,  it increased leaf N, possibly reducing  the impact of biochemical limitation on A and avoiding a further A and productivity decline.

Experiment was financially supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project No.17-77-20046.

How to cite: Liberati, D., Brykova, R., Moscatelli, M. C., Moscatello, S., Pallozzi, E., and Gavrichkova, O.: Diffusive limitation to photosynthesis and plant-microbe N competition dominate the urban lawn response to secondary salinization, EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-11475, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-11475, 2020

Comments on the presentation

AC: Author Comment | CC: Community Comment | Report abuse

Presentation version 1 – uploaded on 04 May 2020
  • CC1: Comment on EGU2020-11475, Yaarao Oppenheimer-Shaanan, 05 May 2020

    Hi,

    very nice  work. I wonder  which soil extracellular enzymes did you check? iof microb? fungi?

    Yaara

    • AC1: Reply to CC1, Olga Gavrichkova, 06 May 2020

      Thanks for your interest!  In presentation we presented results only on N-related enzymes. All in all we analyzed 9 enzymes of C, N, P and S cycles: for carbon  β-glucosidase (EC 3.2.1.21), α-glucosidase (EC 3.2.1.20), xylosidase (EC 3.2.2.27) and cellobiohydrolase (EC 3.2.1.91); for nitrogen chitinase (EC 3.2.1.30) and leucin-aminopeptidase, for phosphorus acid-phosphatase (EC 3.1.3.2); for sulphur arylsulphatase (EC 3.1.6.1). Finally, the butyrate esterase (EC 3.1.1.1) was analyzed as a proxy of intracellular activity. Some of the results will be very soon available in this paper, which is under production now  DOI: 10.1002/ldr.3627

    • AC2: Reply to CC1, Maria Cristina Moscatelli, 06 May 2020

      Dear Yaara,

      thanks for your query. We tested a set of soil enzymes that may inform on biogeochemical cycles occurring in soil, in particular on degradative processes carried out by microrganisms.

      In this work, two enzymes related to N cycle are shown: chitinase and leucine aminopeptidase. The technique we use, the fluorimetric method, does help to infer information on the source of these enzymes (bacteria or fungi), however some activities may been considered as indirect indicators of fungal biomass, such as chitinase and arylsulfatase.

      Thanks

      MCM