EGU2020-12027, updated on 11 Jan 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-12027
EGU General Assembly 2020
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Origin of the Scotia Sea Magnetic Susceptibility Signal Across the MIS6-MIS5 Transition

Stefanie Brachfeld1, Brendan Reilly2, Lisa Tauxe2, Bridget Lee3, Michael Weber4, Maureen Raymo5, Trevor Williams6, Ian Bailey7, Marga Garcia8, Michelle Guitard9, Sidney Hemming5, Yasmina Martos10, Suzanne OConnell11, Lara F. Perez12, Thomas Ronge13, Xufeng Zheng14, Kathy Licht15, and the Expedition 382 Scientists*
Stefanie Brachfeld et al.
  • 1Department of Earth and Environmental Studies, Montclair State University, Montclair, NJ, USA (brachfelds@montclair.edu)
  • 2Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, USA
  • 3Department of Earth Sciences, University of California Riverside, USA
  • 4Steinmann-Institute, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
  • 5Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, USA
  • 6International Ocean Discovery Program, Texas A&M University, USA
  • 7Camborne School of Mines, University of Exeter, UK
  • 8Andalusian Institute of Earth Sciences, University of Granada, Spain
  • 9College of Marine Science, University of South Florida St. Petersburg, USA
  • 10NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, University of Maryland System, USA
  • 11Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Wesleyan University, CT, USA
  • 12British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge, UK
  • 13Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz-Center for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany
  • 14Chinese Academy of Sciences, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Guangzhou, China
  • 15Department of Earth Sciences, Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis, USA
  • *A full list of authors appears at the end of the abstract

Patterns of variability in Pleistocene magnetic susceptibility (k) from deep-sea sediment cores from the Scotia Sea show a striking similarity to patterns of dust flux recorded in the EPICA Dronning Maud Land (EDML) ice core.  Antarctic marine k records broadly reflect the interplay of lithogenic sediment provenance, biological productivity, sediment transport processes, and post-depositional diagenesis. Here we explore the origin of the Scotia Sea k record via a detailed rock magnetic study across the transition from MIS 6 to MIS 5. We analyzed bulk sediment and grain size separates in order to construct magnetic signatures of iceberg rafted debris (IBRD), sortable silt, and eolian input. The MIS 6-MIS 5 transition consists of three lithologies, a high k silty-clay-rich diatomaceous mud deposited during the glacial interval, an IBRD-rich but low k silty clay that marks the onset of deglaciation, and a low k diatomaceous ooze in which IBRD decreases forward through time. The high k glacial sediment is characterized by multi-domain hysteresis parameters, low χARM/χ values, S ratios near 1, and thermomagnetic curves indicative of low-Ti titanomagnetite. The absence of k peaks in the IBRD-rich silty-clay and IBRD rich diatomaceous ooze likely reflects the weakly magnetic lithogenic detritus supplied by Weddell Sea Embayment (WSE) ice streams, such as sandstone, quartzite, metasedimentary lithologies, phyllite and schist observed in lateral moraines adjacent to ice streams of the eastern WSE. The deglacial interval is characterized by elevated MR/MS, χARM/χ, and HIRM values, and decreased S-ratios in the bulk sediment, suggesting a greater proportion of high coercivity minerals such as hematite or goethite in the iron oxide assemblage. Preliminary data from grain size separates indicates that the clay mass fraction is > 0.5 in all three lithologies. Clay is also the dominant size fraction in the EDML ice core dust, with particle sizes generally < 5 μm. The Scotia Sea clay fraction k values are a factor 1.5 to 5 weaker than the silt fraction k values, and therefore are not the main carrier of the bulk k signal. The rock magnetic signatures of Scotia Sea sediment will be compared to those of terrestrial till and bedrock from the WSE, and to those of potential dust sources in South America to identify the sediment sources and environmental processes responsible for the k signal.

Expedition 382 Scientists:

Linda Armbrecht, Zhiheng Du, Gerson Fauth, Anna Glüder, Marcus Gutjahr, Ivan Hernandez-Almeida, Frida Snilsveit Hoem, Ji-Hwan Hwang, Mutsumi Iizuka, Yuji Kato, Victoria Peck, Osamu Seki, Shubham Tripathi, Jonathan Warnock

How to cite: Brachfeld, S., Reilly, B., Tauxe, L., Lee, B., Weber, M., Raymo, M., Williams, T., Bailey, I., Garcia, M., Guitard, M., Hemming, S., Martos, Y., OConnell, S., Perez, L. F., Ronge, T., Zheng, X., and Licht, K. and the Expedition 382 Scientists: Origin of the Scotia Sea Magnetic Susceptibility Signal Across the MIS6-MIS5 Transition, EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-12027, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-12027, 2020