EGU2020-12596
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-12596
EGU General Assembly 2020
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Collisionless electron dynamics in the expanding solar wind

Maria Elena Innocenti1, Elisabetta Boella2, Anna Tenerani3, and Marco Velli4
Maria Elena Innocenti et al.
  • 1Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Interstellar and Heliospheric Physics Division, 4800 Oak Grove Dr, Pasadena, CA 91109 (maria.elena.innocenti@jpl.nasa.gov)
  • 2Lancaster University, Physics Department, Bailrigg, Lancaster LA1 4YW, UK
  • 3Department of Physics, The University of Texas at Austin, TX 78712
  • 4University of California Los Angeles, Department of Earth, Planetary, and Space Sciences, 595 Charles E Young Dr E, Los Angeles, CA 90095

Observations of solar wind electron properties, as displayed in the Tperp/Tpar vs βpar plane, appear to be constrained both in the Tperp/Tpar <1 and in the Tperp/Tpar >1 regimes by the electron firehose instability (EFI) and by the whistler instability respectively [Štverák 2008]. The onset mechanism of the EFI is established: solar wind expansion results in an electron thermal anisotropy, which in turns promotes the development of the instability that contributes to limit that same anisotropy [Innocenti 2019a]. However, if this were the only mechanism at work in the expanding solar wind, electron observations would pool at the EFI marginal instability line. Instead, they populate the “stable” interval bound by EFI and whistler marginal instability lines. It is not fully clear which role fully kinetic processes have in lifting the observed data points above the EFI marginal stability line and into the “stable” area. Other competing processes redistributing excess parallel energy into the perpendicular direction, such as collisions, may be at work as well [Yoon 2019].

We investigate this issue with Particle In Cell, Expanding Box Model  simulations [Innocenti 2019b] of EFI developing self consistently in the expanding solar wind. Our results show that after the EFI marginal stability line is reached, further collisionless evolution brings our simulated data points in the “stable” area. We thus demonstrate that, at least under certain circumstances, purely collisionless processes may explain observed solar wind observations, without the need of invoking collisions as a way to channel excess parallel energy into the perpendicular direction.

 

Štverák, Štěpán, et al. "Electron temperature anisotropy constraints in the solar wind." Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 113.A3 (2008).

Innocenti, Maria Elena, et al. "Onset and Evolution of the Oblique, Resonant Electron Firehose Instability in the Expanding Solar Wind Plasma." The Astrophysical Journal 883.2 (2019): 146.

Yoon, P. H., et al. "Solar Wind Temperature Isotropy." Physical review letters 123.14 (2019): 145101.

Innocenti, Maria Elena, Anna Tenerani, and Marco Velli. "A Semi-implicit Particle-in-cell Expanding Box Model Code for Fully Kinetic Simulations of the Expanding Solar Wind Plasma." The Astrophysical Journal 870.2 (2019): 66.

How to cite: Innocenti, M. E., Boella, E., Tenerani, A., and Velli, M.: Collisionless electron dynamics in the expanding solar wind, EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-12596, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-12596, 2020

Displays

Display file