The stratospheric response and surface influence in a bias-corrected model.
- 1Finnish Meteorological Institute, Meteorology, Helsinki, Finland (nicholas.tyrrell@fmi.fi)
- 2Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
We investigate the effect of systematic model biases on teleconnections influencing the Northern Hemisphere wintertime circulation. We perform a two-step nudging and bias-correcting scheme for the dynamic variables of the ECHAM6 atmospheric model to reduce errors in the model climatology relative to ERA-Interim. The developed scheme is efficient in removing errors in model’s climatology. In particular, large negative bias in December-February mean zonal stratospheric winds is reduced by up to 75%, significantly increasing the strength of the Northern Hemisphere wintertime stratospheric polar vortex. The bias-corrections are applied to the full atmosphere or stratosphere only.
We compare the response of bias-corrected and control runs to internal stratospheric variability and surface forcings that are important on seasonal timescales: Siberian snow cover in October; the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation (QBO); and ENSO. We find the bias-corrected model has the potential for a strengthened and more realistic response to the teleconnections, either in the stratospheric or surface response. In particular, the bias-corrected model has a strong QBO teleconnection which modulates the extratropical polar vortex and sea level pressure variability in a manner similar to that seen in observations. The Siberian snow forcing with the stratosphere-only bias-corrections also leads to an enhanced surface response relative to the control. The mechanism behind the sensitivity of the teleconnections to model biases is discussed.
How to cite: Tyrrell, N., Karpechko, A., and Rast, S.: The stratospheric response and surface influence in a bias-corrected model., EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-12888, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-12888, 2020