EGU2020-13671
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-13671
EGU General Assembly 2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Performance of a Physically Based Gap-Filling Technique of in-situ Soil Moisture, in Comparison with Machine Learning

Seulchan Lee1, Hyunho Jeon2, Jongmin Park2, and Minha Choi1
Seulchan Lee et al.
  • 1Department of Water Resources, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Republic of Korea (seul94@skku.edu; mhchoi@skku.edu)
  • 2School of Civil, Architectural Engineering & Landscape Architecture, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Republic of Korea

As the importance of Soil Moisture (SM) has been recognized in various fields, including agricultural practices, natural hazards, and climate predictions, ground-based SM sensors such as Frequency Domain Reflectometry (FDR), Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR) are being widely used. However, gaps in in-situ SM data are still unavoidable due not only to sensor failure or low voltage supply, but to environmental conditions. Since it is essential to acquire accurate and continuous SM data for its application purpose, the gaps in the data should be handled properly. In this study, we propose a physically based gap-filling method in a mountainous region, in which in-situ SM measurements and flux tower are located. This method is developed only with in-situ SM and precipitation data, by considering variation characteristics of SM: increases rapidly with precipitation and decreases asymptotically afterward. SM data from the past is used to build Look-Up-Tables (LUTs) that contains the amount and speed of increment and decrement of SM, with and without precipitation, respectively. Based on the developed LUTs, the gaps are filled successively from where the gaps started. At the same time, we also introduce a machine learning-based gap-filling framework for the comparison. Ancillary data from the flux tower (e.g. net radiation, relative humidity) was used as input for training, with the same period as in the physically based method. The trained models are then used to fill the gaps. We found that both proposed methods are able to fill the gaps of in-situ SM reasonably, with capabilities to capture the characteristics of SM variation. Results from the comparison indicate that the physically based gap-filling method is very accurate and efficient when there’s limited information, and also suitable to be used for prediction purposes.

How to cite: Lee, S., Jeon, H., Park, J., and Choi, M.: Performance of a Physically Based Gap-Filling Technique of in-situ Soil Moisture, in Comparison with Machine Learning, EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-13671, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-13671, 2020