EGU2020-13822
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-13822
EGU General Assembly 2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Grass development in the Amazon drainage basin, evidence from the fossil and phytochemical record

Carina Hoorn1, Judith Kirschner1, Maxine Beer1, Caixia Wei1, Tyler Kukla2, and Phil Jardine3
Carina Hoorn et al.
  • 1University of Amsterdam, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, Ecosystem and Landscape Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands (m.c.hoorn@uva.nl)
  • 2Stanford University, School of Earth, Energy & Environmental Sciences, California, USA (tykukla@stanford.edu)
  • 3Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany (jardine@uni-muenster.de)

The Poaceae (the grass family) includes over 11000 species and covers large part of the Earth land surfaces. Their history is rooted in the Cretaceous, but this group only expanded fully over the globe during the late Miocene. In the Amazon drainage basin (ADB) grasses were at the core of a heated debate, in which it was hypothesized that during the Pleistocene glacial periods grasses replaced vast extents of the Amazon rainforest. Although this hypothesis is now rejected, the history of grasses in the ADB still remains to be resolved. In this paper we propose a 3-staged model for grass development in the ADB: (1) from c. 23 to 9 Ma western Amazonia was dominated by a megawetland (the ‘Pebas system’) that harboured large amounts of (aquatic?) grasses; (2) from c. 9 Ma Andean uplift prompted megafan and fluvial environments on the Andean slopes and in the Amazon lowlands respectively, these environments created new settings for grass colonization; (3) from c. 5 Ma grasses were firmly established in the tropical alpine vegetation (páramo), the tropical lowland floodplains (várzeas), and savannas (cerrado). To test these scenarios we analysed Neogene and extant Andes-Amazonian grasses by means of Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscopy, we performed a Light- and Scanning Electron Microscopy analysis, and compared the results with existing biomarker data from the Neogene sediments. Here we report on the preliminary results that, among others, suggest that in the middle Miocene aquatic (C3) taxa were comon in the Amazon lowlands. Although further study will have to confirm the precise nature of the ADB grass history, we anticipate that abiotic processes during the Neogene and Quaternary left a strong imprint in the grass phytogeography of northern South America.

 

How to cite: Hoorn, C., Kirschner, J., Beer, M., Wei, C., Kukla, T., and Jardine, P.: Grass development in the Amazon drainage basin, evidence from the fossil and phytochemical record, EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-13822, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-13822, 2020

Display materials

Display file

Comments on the display material

AC: Author Comment | CC: Community Comment | Report abuse

Display material version 1 – uploaded on 04 May 2020, no comments