EGU2020-14054
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-14054
EGU General Assembly 2020
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Surface ozone and land-atmosphere coupling

Tamara Emmerichs1, Huug Ouwersloot2, Astrid Kerkweg1, Silvano Fares3, Ivan Mammarella4, and Domenico Taraborrelli1
Tamara Emmerichs et al.
  • 1Forschungszentrum Jülich, Institute of Energy and Climate Research 8, Jülich, Germany (t.emmerichs@fz-juelich.de), (d.taraborrelli@fz-juelich.de)
  • 2former at Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany
  • 3National Research Council, Institute of Bioeconomy, Rome, Italy
  • 4Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research/Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Helsinki, Finland

Surface ozone is a harmful air pollutant, heavily influenced by chemical production and loss processes. Dry deposition to vegetation is a relevant loss process responsible for 20 % of the total tropospheric ozone loss. Its parametrization in atmospheric chemistry models represents a major source of uncertainty for the global tropospheric ozone budget and might account for the mismatch with observations. The model used in this study, the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy2) linked to ECHAM5 as atmospheric circulation model (EMAC) is no exception. Like many global models, EMAC employs a “resistances in series” scheme with the major surface deposition via plant stomata which is hardly sensitive to meteorology depending only on solar radiation. Unlike many global models, however, EMAC uses a simplified high resistance for non-stomatal deposition which makes this pathway negligible.                             

Hence, a revision of the dry deposition scheme of EMAC is desirable. The scheme has been extended with empirical adjustment factors to predict stomatal responses to temperature and vapour pressure deficit. Furthermore, an explicit formulation of humidity depending non-stomatal deposition at the leaf surface (cuticle) has been implemented based on established schemes. Next, the soil moisture availability function for plants has been critically reviewed and modified in order to avoid a stomatal closure where the model shows a strong soil dry bias, e.g. Amazon basin in dry season.

The last part of the presentation will show comparisons of dry deposition velocities and fluxes comparing simulations with data obtained from four experimental sites where ozone deposition is measured with micrometeorological techniques. The impacts of the changes on daily and seasonal patterns of ozone dry deposition will be discussed with a highlight on surface ozone, global distribution and budget.

How to cite: Emmerichs, T., Ouwersloot, H., Kerkweg, A., Fares, S., Mammarella, I., and Taraborrelli, D.: Surface ozone and land-atmosphere coupling, EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-14054, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-14054, 2020

Displays

Display file