EGU2020-14807
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-14807
EGU General Assembly 2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

To burn or not to burn? Impact of in-situ oil burning by-products on marine plankton: A mesocosm experimental approach

Iordanis Magiopoulos1, Christos Chantzaras2, Katerina Symiakaki1,2, Eleftheria Antoniou3, Christina Pavloudi4, Filomena Romano1, Giorgos Piperakis1, Giulio Zanaroli5, Nikolaos Kalogerakis3, and Paraskevi Pitta1
Iordanis Magiopoulos et al.
  • 1Institute of Oceanography, Hellenic Centre Marine Research, Heraklion, Greece (iordanis@hcmr.gr)
  • 2Department of Biology, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
  • 3Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Crete, Chania, Greece
  • 4Institute of Marine Biology, Biotechnology and Aquaculture, Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Heraklion, Greece
  • 5Department of Civil, Chemical, Environmental, and Materials Engineering, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

In-situ oil burning (isOB) is one of the oil-spill mitigation measures and has been used after some major oil-spill events such as the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. Although the ecological impact of oil spills and mitigation measures on the marine ecosystem are of great interest, the toxicity and biodegradation potential of isOB by-products have been poorly addressed and mainly are an unknown.

We investigated the effects of burned oil residue and soot deposition on the marine plankton communities of the oligotrophic Eastern Mediterranean Sea using a mesocosm experimental approach. Coastal water (collected at 300 m from the coast, north of Crete, Greece) was incubated in 3.5 m3 mesocosms for 26 days. Three different treatments in triplicates were tested. In one treatment, 2 L of Iranian Crude Oil were added and burned (Burned treatment) while soot was collected and deposited in the form of artificial rain in more mesocosms (Soot treatment) using a custom-designed soot collection apparatus. The third treatment served as the non-contaminated control (Control treatment). Samples were collected at 9 time points (from Day 0 to Day 26) and the plankton, from viruses to micro-plankton, was studied using flow cytometry and inverted microscopy.  

Although the abundance of prokaryotes was slightly decreased in Burned and Soot treatments compared to the Control, the percentage of active heterotrophic bacteria and their relative size (based on their cytometric characteristics) was higher, which is an indication of increased bacterial activity in the contaminated treatments. Viral to Prokaryote Ratio and pico/nano-eukaryotic abundance were significantly increased in the Burned treatment compared to the Control, which could explain the lower bacterial abundance, despite the estimated increased activity, in the Burned treatment. Also, ciliate abundance was significantly lower in the Burned treatment while the opposite was observed in the Soot treatment (up to three orders of magnitude difference between Burned and Soot) compared to Control. Moreover, soot deposits seem to have had a positive effect on the abundance of dinoflagellates and diatoms.

To our knowledge, this is the first experiment to study the effects of isOB on whole marine plankton communities. It is evident that the in-situ oil burning has a significant effect on the plankton communities not only at the event site but also on distant areas through the soot deposition.     

How to cite: Magiopoulos, I., Chantzaras, C., Symiakaki, K., Antoniou, E., Pavloudi, C., Romano, F., Piperakis, G., Zanaroli, G., Kalogerakis, N., and Pitta, P.: To burn or not to burn? Impact of in-situ oil burning by-products on marine plankton: A mesocosm experimental approach , EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-14807, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-14807, 2020

Displays

Display file