EGU2020-15244
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-15244
EGU General Assembly 2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Re-evaluation of groundwater residence time using a combined 3H/3He, 14C and 222Rn approach

Jodie Miller1, Zita Harilall1, Yaa Agyare-Dwomoh1, Laszlo Palcsu2, and Ryno Botha3
Jodie Miller et al.
  • 1Department of Earth Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa (jmiller@sun.ac.za, zitaharilall@gmail.com, yagyaredwomoh@gmail.com)
  • 2Isotope Climatology and Environmental Research Centre (ICER) H-4001 Debrecen, Pf. 51, Hungary Palcsu.Laszlo@atmoki.mta.hu
  • 3Department of Physics, University of Western Cape, Western Cape, South Africa

The TMG aquifer is one of the largest aquifer systems in South Africa and is currently targeted as a potential source of potable water for the City of Cape Town (CoCT) which recently experienced a period of extreme water stress. Groundwater in the TMG aquifer typically has very low total dissolved salts, on the order of 50 mg/L of less, making it challenging to constrain the groundwater residence time. However, residence time is a key parameter to provide proper constraints on turnover time of groundwater in the aquifer system before large-scale abstraction takes place, in order to evaluate the sustainability of the resource. This study used the 3H/3He system to date modern water (<100 years) and 14C to date older groundwater (>500 years). Groundwater residence times were determined for the TMG aquifer and five associated aquifer systems in the Western Cape of South Africa, namely the alluvial, Witteberg, Bokkeveld, Cape Granite Suite (CGS) and Malmesbury aquifers. Good correlation between 3H/3He and 14C ages indicate relatively short residence times for the alluvial and TMG aquifers whereas groundwater from the Witteberg, Bokkeveld, CGS and Malmesbury aquifers indicate mixing of older water bodies with modern recharge resulting in distinctly different ages derived from the two dating systems. In an attempt to better constrain the mixing relationship with modern precipitation, 222Rn was used to assess the interaction between precipitation and groundwater after rainfall events. The basis for this approach comes from the assumption that precipitation has little 222Rn in it, with groundwater 222Rn derived from interaction with the groundwater host rocks. This should result in groundwater 222Rn activity being diluted through recharge with precipitation. However, since the half-life of 222Rn is only 3.82 days, 222Rn activities should respond rapidly to recharge, and should also recover rapidly from this recharge. Three behavioural characteristics were established; (1) groundwaters where the 14C activity was of ≥ 100 pMC (TMG and alluvial aquifers), and where an immediate dilution in radon’s activity was recorded due to direct recharge. (2) groundwaters where the 14C activity was 80% – 90% pMC (Malmesbury aquifer) where a delayed response in the dilution of radon’s activity was recorded; and (3) groundwaters where the 14C activity was ≤ 70% and radon activities were stable indicating little or no recharge. 222Rn thus proved an important mechanism for evaluating the validity of residence times derived from both 3H/3He and 14C.

How to cite: Miller, J., Harilall, Z., Agyare-Dwomoh, Y., Palcsu, L., and Botha, R.: Re-evaluation of groundwater residence time using a combined 3H/3He, 14C and 222Rn approach, EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-15244, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-15244, 2020