The importance of slope correction for studying Greenland ice change using radar altimetry (CryoSat-2)

Satellite radar altimetry is one of the most important tools for monitoring changes in the mass balance of the world's ice sheets. Acquiring long time series of elevation changes is crucial, and the long lifetime of the CryoSat-2 mission has contributed wonderfully to this effort. However, once the CryoSat-2 mission ends, it will be important to bridge the gap between CryoSat-2 and future radar altimetry missions. IceSat2 data can help aid this effort, assuming that the appropriate processing techniques are used to allow the comparison of radar and laser altimetry. Furthermore, different altimetry techniques come with their own pitfalls, in radar altimetry signal penetration into the snowpack introduces ambiguity in the origin of reflected echo, a major issue not present in laser altimetry. It is therefore important to minimize this ambiguity by developing processing algorithms for the radar altimetry form CryoSat-2 mission, with a special attention on relating it to the IceSat2 mission.  

Focusing on Greenland Ice Sheet (GIS), we have developed a processing chain for the estimation of surface elevations and elevation changes from the ESA level-1 product (L1b) Baseline D. As a first step, we investigated the importance of Digital Elevation Model (DEM) in the slope correction algorithm and how it affects the estimated surface elevation.

 

The waveform retracker algorithm was developed following the method by Nilsson (2015) with a range of thresholds in the threshold retracker applied to the waveform. Knowing the estimated range and the altitude of the satellite at the time of the measurement, we calculated the corresponding surface elevation at the point of the wavelet reflection.

We apply a slope correction method by Hurkmans (2012), where displacement from the nadir location in x- and y- directions is calculated using the slope angle and aspect retrieved from a DEM, giving a new set of coordinates that represents the location of the estimated elevation. We use two sets of slope angle and aspect calculated from two DEMs, ArcticDEM Release 7 (Porter et al., 2018) and Greenland Ice Mapping Project (GIMP) DEM (Howat et al., 2017). Both DEMs are similar in terms of optical imagery data source, processing and resolution, however, they have been referenced to different laser altimetry data. We investigate this effect in the slope correction of radar altimetry from CryoSat2 mission.

We checked the two sets of slope correction data using IceSat-2 data (Smith et al., 2019) corresponding to the same time period, and selected by nearest point calculation. We analyze and discuss the differences between IceSat-2 data and CryoSat-2 data with slope correction using GIMP DEM or ArcticDEM.