An Inter-Comparison of Arctic Synoptic Scale Storms between Four Global Reanalysis Datasets

Arctic sea ice has reduced significantly over recent decades and is projected to reduce further over this century. This has made the Arctic more accessible and increased opportunities for the expansion of business and industrial activities.  As a result, the exposure and risk of humans and infrastructure to extreme storms will increase in the Arctic.

Our understanding of the current risk from storms comes from analysing the past, for example, by using storm tracking algorithms to detect storms in reanalysis datasets.  However, there are multiple reanalysis datasets available from different institutions and there are multiple storm tracking methods.  Previous studies have found that there can be differences between reanalysis datasets and between storm tracking methods in the climatology of storms, particularly in mid-latitude regions rather than the Arctic.  In this study, we aimed to improve the understanding of Arctic storms by assessing their characteristics in multiple global reanalyses, the ECMWF-Interim Reanalysis (ERA-Interim), the 55-Year Japanese Reanalysis (JRA-55), the NASA-Modern Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications Version 2 (MERRA-2), and the NCEP-Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (NCEP-CFSR), using the same storm tracking method based on 850 hPa relative vorticity and mean sea level pressure.

The results from this study show that there are no significant trends in Arctic storm characteristics between 1980-2017, even though the Arctic has undergone rapid change.  Although some similar Arctic storm characteristics are found between the reanalysis datasets, there are generally higher differences between the reanalyses in winter (DJF) than in summer (JJA).  In addition, substantial differences can arise between using the same storm tracking method based on 850 hPa relative vorticity or mean sea level pressure, which adds to the uncertainty associated with current Arctic storm characteristics.