EGU2020-17181
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-17181
EGU General Assembly 2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Tropospheric NO2 and HCHO derived from dual-scan MAX-DOAS measurements in Uccle (Belgium) and application to S5P/TROPOMI validation

Ermioni Dimitropoulou1, Francois Hendrick1, Martine M. Friedrich1, Gaia Pinardi1, Frederik Tack1, Alexis Merlaud1, Caroline Fayt1, Christian Hermans1, Frans Fierens2, and Michel Van Roozendael1
Ermioni Dimitropoulou et al.
  • 1Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy, UV VIS DOAS Group, Brussels, Belgium (ermioni.dimitropoulou@aeronomie.be)
  • 2IRCEL-CELINE, Brussels, Belgium

Ground-based Multi-Axis Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (MAX-DOAS) measurements of aerosols, tropospheric nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and formaldehyde (HCHO) have been carried out in Uccle, Brussels, during two years (March 2018 – March 2020). The MAX-DOAS instrument has been operating in both UV and visible (Vis) wavelength ranges in a dual-scan configuration consisting of two sub-modes: (1) an elevation scan in a fixed viewing azimuthal direction (the so-called main azimuthal direction) pointing and (2) an azimuthal scan in a fixed low elevation angle (2o). By applying a vertical profile inversion algorithm in the main azimuthal direction and an adapted version of the parameterization technique proposed by Sinreich et al. (2013) in the other azimuthal directions, near-surface  concentrations (VMRs) and vertical column densities (VCDs) are retrieved in ten different azimuthal directions.

The present work focuses on the seasonal horizontal variation of NO2 and HCHO around the measurement site. The observations show a clear seasonal cycle of these trace gases. An important application of the dual-scan MAX-DOAS measurements is the validation of satellite missions with high spatial resolution, such as TROPOMI/S5P. Measuring the tropospheric  VCDs in different azimuthal directions is shown to improve the spatial colocation with satellite measurements leading to a better agreement between both datasets. By using  vertical profile information derived from the MAX-DOAS measurements, we show that a persistent systematic underestimation of the TROPOMI  data can be explained by uncertainties in the a-priori NO2 profile shape in the satellite retrieval. A similar validation study for TROPOMI HCHO is currently under progress and preliminary results will be presented.

References:

Sinreich, R., Merten, A., Molina, L., and Volkamer, R.: Parameterizing radiative transfer to convert MAX-DOAS dSCDs into near-surface box-averaged mixing ratios, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 1521–1532, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-1521-2013, 2013.

How to cite: Dimitropoulou, E., Hendrick, F., Friedrich, M. M., Pinardi, G., Tack, F., Merlaud, A., Fayt, C., Hermans, C., Fierens, F., and Van Roozendael, M.: Tropospheric NO2 and HCHO derived from dual-scan MAX-DOAS measurements in Uccle (Belgium) and application to S5P/TROPOMI validation, EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-17181, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-17181, 2020

Displays

Display file