From InSAR derived relative tropospheric Slant Total Delay maps to absolute Zenith Total Delay maps: comparisons between tropospheric delay products to define a strategy for meteorological applications.

InSAR derived Atmospheric Phase Screens (APSs) contain the difference between the atmospheric delay along the SAR sensor line-of-sight of two acquisition epochs: the slave and the master epochs. Using estimates of the atmospheric state at the master epoch, coming from independent sources, the APSs can be transformed into maps of tropospheric Zenith Total Delay (ZTD), that is related to the columnar atmospheric water vapor content. Assimilation experiments of such products into numerical weather prediction (NWP) models have shown a positive impact in the prediction of convective storms.

In this work, a systematical comparison between various APS and ZTD products aims at determining the optimal procedure to go from APSs to InSAR-derived absolute ZTD maps, i.e. to estimate the master delay map. Two different approaches are compared.

The first is based on a stack of ZTD maps produced with the assimilation of GNSS ZTD observations into an NWP model. This acts as a physically based interpolator of the GNSS values, which have a spatial resolution much coarser than the InSAR APS one.

The second is based on a stack of ZTD maps derived by an Iterative Tropospheric Decomposition (ITD) model, as implemented in the GACOS service. In this case, the high-resolution ZTD maps are obtained by an iterative interpolation of a global atmospheric circulation model values and GNSS values where available.

The results of the comparisons and sensitivity tests on the number of ZTD maps needed to derive the unknown master delay map are shown.