EGU2020-17960
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-17960
EGU General Assembly 2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Participatory water resources monitoring as a science-policy tool: a decade of experience from the Andes

Boris Ochoa-Tocachi1,2,3, Wouter Buytaert1,2, and Bert De Bièvre2,4
Boris Ochoa-Tocachi et al.
  • 1Imperial College London, Civil and Environmental Engineering and Grantham Institute – Climate Change and the Environment, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
  • 2Regional Initiative for Hydrological Monitoring of Andean Ecosystems (iMHEA), Lima, Peru
  • 3ATUK Consultoría Estratégica, Cuenca, Ecuador
  • 4Fondo para la Protección del Agua (FONAG), Quito, Ecuador

Evidence-based decision making is seen as the key to sustainable water resource and catchment management. However, a major obstacle for evidence generation is the limited amount of data available from in-situ hydrometeorological monitoring. Monitoring is in decline globally, and this problem is particularly acute in high-elevation environments and in the tropics. Nevertheless, this situation also puts these environments in a promising position to study the potential of multi-source, polycentric generated information to tackle data scarcity.

Established in 2009, a bottom-up partnership of academic and non-governmental institutions pioneered participatory hydrological monitoring in the tropical Andes. Participatory approaches to environmental monitoring are becoming increasingly popular and are being promoted as a potential pathway to address long-standing data gaps. The partnership, known as the Regional Initiative for Hydrological Monitoring of Andean Ecosystems (iMHEA from its Spanish abbreviation) has instrumented a network of more than 30 headwater research catchments (< 20 km2) covering four major biomes (páramo, jalca, puna, and forest) in nine locations of the tropical Andes. Precipitation and streamflow are monitored at high frequency with the involvement of local communities, governments, and research institutions. The network is designed to characterize the impacts of changes in land use and watershed interventions on catchment hydrological response and has started delivering fundamental information to guide processes of decision making more effectively and influencing policy-making on water resources at local and national scales.

Participatory water resources monitoring can be seen a science-policy tool. Here we present the drivers and context of the process that led to the creation of iMHEA, currently one of the largest initiatives of grassroots and participatory environmental monitoring in the world, and the main challenges that lie ahead. Observational data from experimental catchments have an essential value for hydrology and water resources management that increases with time. The long-term sustainability in the monitoring will allow a deeper understanding of current uncertainties, including seasonality, natural variability, environmental changes, and extreme events such as drought and flooding.

How to cite: Ochoa-Tocachi, B., Buytaert, W., and De Bièvre, B.: Participatory water resources monitoring as a science-policy tool: a decade of experience from the Andes, EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-17960, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-17960, 2020

Displays

Display file