EGU2020-18194
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-18194
EGU General Assembly 2020
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Exploring the scattering and reabsorption of chlorophyll fluorescence: implications for remote sensing of photosynthesis

Karolina Sakowska1,2, Maria Pilar Cendrero-Mateo*3,4, Christiaan van der Tol5, Marco Celesti6, Giorgio Alberti7, Radosław Juszczak8, Franco Miglietta1,9, Uwe Rascher3, and the other members of the SOYFLEX campaign team*
Karolina Sakowska et al.
  • 1Institute of BioEconomy (IBE), National Research Council (CNR), Italy
  • 2Institute of Ecology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
  • 3Institute of Bio- and Geosciences, IBG-2: Plant Sciences, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany
  • 4Image Processing Laboratory, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain (m.pilar.cendrero@uv.es)
  • 5Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
  • 6Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
  • 7Department of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Animal Sciences, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
  • 8Laboratory of Bioclimatology, Department of Ecology and Environmental Protection, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Poznan, Poland
  • 9Foxlab Joint CNR-FEM Initiative, San Michele all'Adige (TN), Italy
  • *A full list of authors appears at the end of the abstract

In recent years, technological progress in high-resolution field spectrometers have enabled the use of alternative tracer for constraining ecosystem-scale photosynthesis, i.e. sun-induced fluorescence (SIF). The principle underlying the use of SIF as a proxy of gross primary productivity (GPP) is based on the fact that the light energy absorbed by chlorophyll molecules can proceed into three different pathways: photochemistry, heat dissipation, and chlorophyll fluorescence. Since these processes directly compete for the same excitation energy, measurements of SIF and non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) are expected to provide information on photosynthetic performance.

However, SIF signal measured at the leaf level or beyond is affected by several processes, including wavelength dependent scattering and reabsorption, which may need to be considered when linking SIF data and photosynthetic CO2 assimilation.

To address this question, we conducted a multi-scale and multi-technique study that considered measurements of photosynthetic (GPP), optical (SIF, reflectance - R and transmittance - T), physiological (NPQ) and biophysical (the amount of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation - APAR) parameters of two soybean varieties: the MinnGold mutant, characterized by significantly reduced chlorophyll content (Chl), and the wild type, non-Chl deficient Eiko. We further used the “Soil-Canopy Observation Photosynthesis and Energy fluxes” (SCOPE) model to investigate the reabsorption and scattering of SIF. The measured leaf R, T and SIF and top-of-the-canopy R were used to retrieve biochemical and structural parameters of both varieties by inversion of the SCOPE model, while its forward mode was used to determine and correct for the scattering and reabsorption of SIF at both leaf and canopy level.

Our study revealed that despite the large difference in Chl content (the ratio of Chl between MinnGold and Eiko was nearly 1:5), similar leaf and canopy photosynthesis rates were maintained in the Chl‐deficient mutant. This phenomenon was captured neither by traditional spectral vegetation indices related to canopy greenness, nor by SIF measured in-situ. However, the modelling simulations revealed that when correcting for leaf and canopy scattering and reabsorption processes both varieties presented similar SIF yield (SIF/APAR). Furthermore, field measurements showed that APAR and NPQ in MinnGold were lower than in Eiko. This together explains the similar measured GPP and simulated SIF yield between the two varieties, and indicates that interpretation and application of SIF as a GPP tracer requires understanding and quantification of all these processes.

other members of the SOYFLEX campaign team:

Gemini Delle Vedove, Alessandro Peressotti (Department of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Animal Sciences, University of Udine, Udine, Italy), Anke Schickling, Onno Muller, Patrick Rademske (Institute of Bio- and Geosciences, IBG-2: Plant Sciences, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich), Cinzia Panigada, Micol Rossini, Giulia Tagliabue, Roberto Colombo, Sergio Cogliati (Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy), Nastassia Vilfan, Peiqi Yang (Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands), Andreas Burkart, Tommaso Julitta (JB Hyperspectral Devices UG, Düsseldorf, Germany), Luis Alonso, Jose Moreno (Image Processing Laboratory, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain)

How to cite: Sakowska, K., Cendrero-Mateo*, M. P., van der Tol, C., Celesti, M., Alberti, G., Juszczak, R., Miglietta, F., and Rascher, U. and the other members of the SOYFLEX campaign team: Exploring the scattering and reabsorption of chlorophyll fluorescence: implications for remote sensing of photosynthesis, EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-18194, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-18194, 2020.

Displays

Display file