EGU2020-21196, updated on 12 Jun 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-21196
EGU General Assembly 2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

New absolute paleointensity results from ~250 Ma Kuznetsk basalts. Weak versus strong geomagnetic field at the P-T boundary.

Andrey Eliseev1,2, Nikolay Mikhaltsov1,2, and Evgeniy Kulakov3
Andrey Eliseev et al.
  • 1Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
  • 2Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics of Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences (IPGG SB RAS), Novosibirsk, Russian Federation.
  • 3Centre for Earth Evolution and Dynamics. University of Oslo. Norway

We present absolute paleointensity results obtained from a collection of samples from ~250 Ma Kuznetsk Traps (Kuznetsk Depression, Southern Siberia). In addition to similar age these rocks display geochemical signatures similar to those reported for basalts of Siberan Traps and represent the southernmost affinity of the latter.

The primary nature of magnetic remanence in studied rocks was established by previous paleomagnetic studies Rock magnetic analysis indicates that the main magnetic mineral is titanomagnetite in a predominantly single-domain state with Curie temperatures between ~275 and 350⁰C. Scanning electron microscopy showed that titanomagnetite grains range in size from 0.5 to 1 μm. Individual grains are separated from each other and “sealed” within silicate matrix, which largely predetermined perfect preservation of primary mineral textures.

Paleointensity estimates were obtained using the Coe-version of Thellier-Thellier double-heating protocol with partial TRM checks. 36 samples (5 sites taken along the Tom River) yielded straight Arai-Nagata diagrams within temperature interval between 100 to 275⁰C. The average paleointensity value obtained from these samples was calculated at 12.7 ± 1 µT (with a factor q of about 11) with corresponding VDM=2.1 ± 0.2 × 1022 Am2.

Arai-Nagata diagrams for 20 samples from two other sites (collected in quarries on the Karakansky ridge) display more complex behavior. Straight linear segment of Arai plots between ~100 and 300⁰C yielded an average paleointensity value of 44 ± 1 μT, which corresponds to a VDM=7.0 ± 0.1 × 1022 Am2. However on higher temperatures, NRM vs. TRM data have a trend of flattening that increase in artificial TRM is accompanied by no loss of NRM. We interpret this observation as a result of laboratory-induced thermochemical alteration, namely, unmixing of homogeneous Ti-magnetites into Ti-rich and Fe-rich phases, with the latter phase responsible for such NRM-lost vs. TRM-gained behavior. Thermomagnetic analyses on these samples indicated mineralogical changes that set approximately at 300⁰C, supporting our interpretation. However, reversible thermomagnetic curves and p-TRM checks within 10% from initial pTRM, below ~300⁰C suggest that paleointensities determined between ~100 and 300 ⁰C of Arai plots are trustworthy.

We will discuss our results and reasons for such radical differences between paleointensity estimates obtained from the same suite of rocks sampled at different locations.

The study was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, grant No. 18-05-00234 and the Russian Science Foundation, grant No. 19-17-00091.

How to cite: Eliseev, A., Mikhaltsov, N., and Kulakov, E.: New absolute paleointensity results from ~250 Ma Kuznetsk basalts. Weak versus strong geomagnetic field at the P-T boundary., EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-21196, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-21196, 2020

Displays

Display file