EGU2020-2151, updated on 12 Jun 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-2151
EGU General Assembly 2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Criteria of the mantle metasomatism intensity and diamond grades of kimberliotes

Alexander Ivanov1, Zdislav Spetsius1, and Mikhail Vavilov2
Alexander Ivanov et al.
  • 1Scientific research geological enterprise, ALROSA, Mirny, Russia
  • 2Sobolev Institute of geology and Mineralogy, SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russian Federarion

We proposed an assessment of the intensity of metasomatic processes in mantle sampled by kimberlites on the example of samples of pyrope compositions from kimberlites with a known diamond grade. The intensity of metasomatic dissolution was estimated on the Ti correlations,  for low and high- Cr  pyropes.

For the titanium content in the pyrope compositions, positive high correlation coefficients were determined for such elements as  Hf, Zr, .Na  typical for the processes of alkaline H2O metasomatism. Binary diagrams makes it possible to determine the main relationship between the mineral-forming elements in the compositions of pyropes and its mineral impurities. Weconcluded that this metasomatism leads to the dissolution of low-chromic pyropes but diamonds still remain and may continue to grow. A higher degree of metasomatism the pyropes are characterized by a high content of titanium,  for pyropes with high chromium contents. High degree of metasomatosis, brings to dissolution of pyropes and diamonds.

Burren  kimberlite pipe Dennis, Pobeda, and Zarnotsa  contains more than 14 %  pyrope grains ad diamond affinity according to  to N. V. Sobolev . Dennis ans dimond bearing thhe Pobeda is burren and Zarnitsa ~0.3 crt/t 

It is considered [1-5] that if the sample contains grains from diamond-bearing eclogical parageneses, or creased percentage of grains from diamond-bearing parageneses according to N. V. Sobolev [1],should contain diamonds.  But  for pyropes containing chromium oxides, Cr pyropes with TIO2 > 0.6 weight  %, should be burren.  As well  even if  there is  high grain content o from th cluster group G10 according to the classification Dawson J. B., Stephens W. E. [2] . Grant RFBR 19-05-00788.

  1. Sobolev N. V., on mineralogical criteria of diamond-bearing kimberlites / / Geology and Geophysics. 1971. No. 3. - Pp. 70-80.
  2. Garanin V. K., Kudryavtseva G. P., Marfunin A. S., Mikhailichenko O. A. Inclusions in diamond and dia-mond-bearing rocks. // Moscow, Moscow state University Publishing house, 1991, 240 p.
  3. Dawson J. B., Stephens W. E. Statistical classification of garnets from kimberlites and xenoliths. J. Geol. 1975. Vol. 83. No. 5. P. 589-607
  4. J. Gurney, R. O. Moore. Geochemical correlation between the minerals of kimberlites and diamonds of the Kalahari Craton, Journal. Geology and Geophysics, Moscow, 1994, p. 12-24
  5. Ivanov A. S., a New criterion for diamond-bearing kimberlites. Proceedings of the XII all-Russian (with in-ternational participation) Fersman session. KSC RAS Apatity, p. 268 -270, 2015.

 

 

                     

How to cite: Ivanov, A., Spetsius, Z., and Vavilov, M.: Criteria of the mantle metasomatism intensity and diamond grades of kimberliotes, EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-2151, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-2151, 2020

Displays

Display file