EGU2020-2158
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-2158
EGU General Assembly 2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Does changing connectivity due to beaver engineering result in changing hydrological function? Understanding the impacts of the return of the Eurasian beaver to Great Britain.

Alan Puttock, Hugh Graham, and Richard Brazier
Alan Puttock et al.
  • University of Exeter, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Geography, Exeter, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (a.k.puttock@ex.ac.uk)

The connectivity of landscapes is increasingly recognised as being a key control over their hydrological function and provides a valuable conceptual approach for understanding the environmental impacts of the return of beaver to European landscapes.

Beavers are the archetypal keystone species, which can profoundly alter ecosystem structure and function through their engineering activity, most notably the building of dams. Beaver dams, associated ponds and other structures such as canals can reduce downstream connectivity. However, conversely beaver engineering can also increase lateral connectivity pushing water sideways, connecting the channel and floodplain, creating complex wetland environments.

Changes in hydrological connectivity associated with beaver, has the potential to alter flow and sediment regimes, biogeochemical cycling and freshwater ecology. Results will be presented from hydrological monitoring across a range of sites in Great Britain where the Eurasian beaver (Castor fiber) has been reintroduced. Analysis will consider (1) does beaver engineering result in flow attenuation across scale and landuse? (2)  Is flow attenuation manifested during both low and high flow conditions?

The return of beaver to intensively managed European landscapes may provide ecosystem service benefits, including natural flood management, water quality, sediment storage and habitat creation (Puttock et al., 2017, 2018). However, beaver activity such as damming and tree felling can also cause management issues (Auster et al., 2019). Therefore, it is critical to understand where and in what density beaver damming may occur. A modelling approach will be presented for determining beaver habitat suitability and dam capacity, which in conjunction with empirical monitoring aims to provide understanding at management and policy relevant scales.

References

Auster, R. E., Puttock, A., & Brazier, R. (2019). Unravelling perceptions of Eurasian beaver reintroduction in Great Britain. Area, area.12576. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12576

Puttock, A., Graham, H. A., Cunliffe, A. M., Elliott, M., & Brazier, R. E. (2017). Eurasian beaver activity increases water storage, attenuates flow and mitigates diffuse pollution from intensively-managed grasslands. Science of The Total Environment, 576, 430–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.122

Puttock, A., Graham, H. A., Carless, D., & Brazier, R. E. (2018). Sediment and Nutrient Storage in a Beaver Engineered Wetland. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4398

How to cite: Puttock, A., Graham, H., and Brazier, R.: Does changing connectivity due to beaver engineering result in changing hydrological function? Understanding the impacts of the return of the Eurasian beaver to Great Britain., EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-2158, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-2158, 2020

Display materials

Display file

Comments on the display material

AC: Author Comment | CC: Community Comment | Report abuse

Display material version 1 – uploaded on 30 Apr 2020, no comments