EGU2020-22035, updated on 12 Jun 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-22035
EGU General Assembly 2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

From megaslides to mass flows: using seismic geomorphology to unveil gravity-driven deformation at continental margins.

Nicola Scarselli
Nicola Scarselli
  • Department of Earth Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, UK (nicola.scarselli@rhul.ac.uk)

Modern seismic geomorphology techniques are implemented to infer modes of emplacement of a wide range of products derived by gravity-driven deformation in continental margins and to discuss the implications of these for exploration of georesources in offshore basins.
High-quality 3D seismic data from the Namibian margin (West Africa) show how margin-scale, extensional-contractional gravity-driven linked systems deformed at least 2 km of Cretaceous post-rift strata. The systems are laterally segmented into a series of scoop-shaped megaslides ~30 km long by ~20 km wide, which are formed by listric headwall fault systems with associated 3D rollover structures and thrust imbricates at their toes. Lateral segmentation occurs along sidewall fault systems that display oblique extensional motion and define horst structures up to 6 km wide between individual slides.
Key examples are shown of slope failures offshore North West Shelf of Australia that affected Jurassic rift strata as well as near seabed, Late Oligocene to Recent, post-rift sediments. The seabed collapse systems originated at water depths of ~1000 m and extended downdip to depths well in excess of 1500 m. These are shallow failures that exhibit width ranging 1-5 km and run out of ~15 km, with estimated volumes of sediments in excess of ~10 km3. A number of these failures are characterised by disrupted, slump-like facies which progressively pass downslope into packages of high amplitude, continuous reflections. This facies transition represents a downslope rheological transformation from slump to mass-flow as evidenced by prominent canyons that link the updip failures to well-developed, downdip fan systems several kilometres across.
In the rift section, slope failures affected domino extensional fault systems in the form of well-imaged footwall degradation complexes. These complexes exhibit overlapping, scoop-shaped scars up to 10 km in length that deteriorated the exposed footwall breakaways. Debris from footwall collapse was resedimented in the hanging wall basins, forming talus wedges up to 300 m thick that taper away from adjacent fault planes for distances of several kilometres. These deposits are characterised by sheeted to contorted seismic facies, indicating a variety of mass-wasting processes accompanying footwall collapse.

This research demonstrates that a broad spectrum of slope instability processes can ensue during the evolution of rift systems to passive margins. Margin-scale megaslides emplace through processes of complex lateral segmentation which can create a variety of trapping mechanisms in the post-rift section of unstable margins. Downslope transformation of deepwater slumps into sediment flows may explain the occurrence of sandy deposits in offshore basins, hundreds of kilometres away from coastlines and river inputs.
On the other hand, fault degradation complexes, which are relevant slope instability processes in rift systems, can redistribute and accumulate footwall reservoirs into hanging-wall basins, increasing the diversity of play types in rifted margins.

How to cite: Scarselli, N.: From megaslides to mass flows: using seismic geomorphology to unveil gravity-driven deformation at continental margins., EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-22035, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-22035, 2020

Display materials

Display file

Comments on the display material

AC: Author Comment | CC: Community Comment | Report abuse

Display material version 1 – uploaded on 02 May 2020
  • CC1: Comment on EGU2020-22035, Harya Nugraha, 13 May 2020

    Hi Nic,

    Thank you very much for sharing this! Your attributes extractions are indeed a feast for my eyes.

    Here and in your recent paper you mention a term 'Composite Failures'. I would like to clarify, is this term refer to flow transformation, i.e. updip slump transforms into debris flows downdip. Or, is it to refer a submarine landslide composing smaller, second-order mass failures developed downdip from the frontal margin of an encasing first-order mass failure? Just like the example you showed here, i.e. the near-seabed example in Australia.

    Thank you very much, Nic.

     

     

  • AC1: Comment on EGU2020-22035, Nicola Scarselli, 13 May 2020

    Dear Harya,

    Extremely delighted to see your interest in the presentation and thaks for contrubuting to the discussion. I think the term should not be too prescriptive, and so I see it as you have nicely put it in the second part of your comment. What do you think?

    • CC2: Reply to AC1, Harya Nugraha, 14 May 2020

      Dear Nic,

      Thanks so much for the reply, I understand it now. 

      Sorry I couldn't catch the live session last week, but the discussion in here is good too!

      Thanks again, Nic.