EGU General Assembly 2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Towards an artificial carbohydrates supply on Earth

Florian Dinger1,2 and Ulrich Platt1,2
Florian Dinger and Ulrich Platt
  • 1Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Heidelberg, Germany (
  • 2Max-Planck Institute for Chemistry, Satellite Remote Sensing, Mainz, Germany

How to feed a growing global population in a secure and sustainable way? The conventional, biogenic agriculture has yet failed to provide a reliable concept which circumvents its severe environmental externalities — such as the massive use of land area, water for irrigation, fertiliser, pesticides, herbicides, and fossil fuel. In contrast, the artificial synthesis of carbohydrates from atmospheric carbon dioxide, water, and renewable energy would allow not only for a highly reliable production without those externalities, but would also allow to increase the agricultural capacities of our planet by several orders of magnitude. All required technology is either commercially available or at least developed on a lab-scale. No directed research has, however, yet been conducted towards an industry-scale carbohydrate synthesis because the biogenic carbohydrate production was economically more competitive. Taking the environmental and socioeconomic externalities of the conventional sugar production into account, this economical narrative has to be questioned. We estimate the production costs of artificial sugar at ~1 €/kg. While the today’s spot market price for conventional sugar is about ~0.3 €/kg, we estimate its total costs (including external costs) at >0.9 €/kg in humid regions and >2 €/kg in semi-arid regions. Accordingly, artificial sugar appears already today to be the less expensive way of production. The artificial sugar production allows in principle also for a subsequent synthesis of other carbohydrates such as starch as well as of fats. These synthetic products could be used as a feedstock to microorganisms, fungi, insects, or livestock in order to enhance also the sustainability of the biogenic production of, e.g., proteins.

How to cite: Dinger, F. and Platt, U.: Towards an artificial carbohydrates supply on Earth, EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-2989,, 2020

Display materials

Display file

Comments on the display material

AC: Author Comment | CC: Community Comment | Report abuse

Display material version 1 – uploaded on 30 Apr 2020
  • CC1: Comment on EGU2020-2989, Dario Liberati, 07 May 2020

    Hi Florian, I read with interest your analysis, undoubtedly a revolutionary approach to food production.
    Just a comment on your work: given that most of energy seems to be used in the direct-Air-Capture device, why don't associate the carbohydrate synthesis to the industrial processes releasing CO2 (such as fossil fuel combustion, ore concrete production), that would provide the substrate for the glucose synthesis in concentration thousand of times higher than atmosphere? 

    best regards, Dario Liberati

    • AC1: Reply to CC1, Florian Dinger, 07 May 2020

      Hi Dario, I guess you refer to Table 1 in the preprint. While the efficiency of the DAC-CO2 device is rather low (~8%), it consumes nevertheless only 1458/9324 = 16% of the total required energy to produce glucose. And its contribution to the total production costs are therefore "only" about 10% in our first estimates.

      The DAC-CO2 device is thus not the major limitation of the techno-economic assessment, but you are perfectly right: retrieving the CO2 directly from a coal power plant or other industrial facilities would nevertheless reduce its costs (and thus this should be implemented in the short-run).

      In defence for our "ignorant" approach, our proposed sugar production plant can be located anywhere (even the required water could be in general separated from the atmosphere, though desalination would be much cheaper).

      Kind regards