Midlatitude cyclone processes as a key to understanding climate sensitivity
- 1Institute of Climate and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Leeds, UK
- 2Met Office, Exeter, UK
- 3Department of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, Columbia University and NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, NY, USA
- 4Cloud Processes Research and Modeling Group, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA
Global climate models (GCMs) differ greatly in their shortwave cloud feedback. One feature that is consistent across GCMs is a positive shortwave cloud feedback in the subtropics, and a negative shortwave cloud feedback across the midlatitudes. Confidence has grown in the mechanisms that lead to, and the strength of, the subtropical shortwave cloud feedback, but the midlatitude negative shortwave cloud feedback is not well-constrained or well-understood. It is critical to reduce uncertainty in midlatitude shortwave cloud feedback. A more positive midlatitude shortwave cloud feedback in the sixth coupled model intercomparison project (CMIP6) has been found to be one of the primary causes of the increased climate sensitivity of CMIP6 models relative to CMIP5. We show that changes in midlatitude cyclones in future climates are the primary cause of the negative shortwave cloud feedback and are thus key to understanding the high climate sensitivity in the most recent GCMs. Warming-induced changes in cloud liquid water path in midlatitude cyclones can almost entirely be explained by Clausius-Clapeyron increasing moisture convergence into cyclones. One concern with simulating midlatitude cyclones is the lack of predictive skill at low resolution. A more realistic relationship between moisture flux and cyclone liquid content is found at high horizontal resolution (∆x<25km), but the cloud feedback within cyclones can be explained by increased moisture convergence across low- and high-resolution models. Observations and models agree that the extratropical shortwave cloud feedback is moderated by precipitation processes in cyclones. This rules out a large contribution from ice-to-liquid transitions, as has been hypothesized in previous studies. Understanding and constraining these precipitation processes is crucial to constraining the response of midlatitude cyclones to warming and by extension climate sensitivity.
Predicted midlatitude cloud feedbacks based on convection-permitting model output (model output is shown in a). The moisture flux along the warm conveyor belt (WCB) of a cyclone plays a central role in determining cyclone cloud liquid water path (LWP) (b). Because WCB scales with water vapor path (WVP) and surface wind speed, WCB moisture flux increases following Clausius-Clapeyron and predicts a negative midlatitude cloud feedback.
How to cite: McCoy, D., Field, P., Bodas-Salcedo, A., Elsaesser, G., and Zelinka, M.: Midlatitude cyclone processes as a key to understanding climate sensitivity, EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-3946, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-3946, 2020