Projected precipitation changes over China for global warming levels at 1.5°C and 2°C in an ensemble of regional climate simulations: Impact of bias-correction algorithms

Four bias-correction methods, i.e. Gamma Cumulative Distribution Function (GamCDF), Quantile-Quantile Adjustment (QQadj), Equidistant CDF Matching (EDCDF) and Transform CDF (CDF-t), were applied to five daily precipitation datasets over China produced by LMDZ4-regional that was nested into five global climate models (GCMs), BCC-CSM1-1m, CNRM-CM5, FGOALS-g2, IPSL-CM5A-MR and MPI-ESM-MR, respectively. A unified mathematical framework can be used to define the four methods, which helps understanding their nature and essence in identifying the most reliable probability distributions of projected climate. CDF-t is shown to be the best bias-correction algorithm based on a comprehensive evaluation of different rainfall indices. Future precipitation projections corresponds to the global warming levels of 1.5°C and 2°C under RCP8.5 were obtained using the bias correction methods. The multi-algorithm and multi-model ensemble characteristics allow to explore the spreading of results, considered as a surrogate of climate projection uncertainty, and to attribute such uncertainties to different sources. It was found that the spread among bias-correction methods is smaller than that among dynamical downscaling simulations. The four bias-correction methods with CDF-t at the top all reduce the spread among the downscaled results. Future projection using CDF-t is thus considered having higher credibility.